I think the general rule of thumb is to underestimate the northward extent of the warm front, especially in situations with convection to the south. The Euro/Canadian seems to place the warm front too far north. I think the NAM 3km is the better solution.
The Euro is still a lot warmer than the NAM. That warm front placement is still very uncertain and will dictate the precipitation for Michigan especially
There are still significant differences in terms of the placement of the warm front in Michigan. The NAM and GFS don't have any of the 40s or 50s getting into Michigan before the main precip while the Canadian models show warm temps making it up. This is a major difference because it determines whether the ground will be warm enough to avoid ice accumulation.
I'm just surprised to see the GFS, Euro, and Canadian showing something similar. It's unusual to see the models jump on the same bandwagon this season. It gives me hope for this one, but I'm also ready to get hurt again.
Ice accumulations could be on the lighter side with this storm, especially at the surface. A lot of the areas with freezing rain reach high 40s and even low 50s on Friday afternoon. The wind speeds are also on the slower side. Of course trees and power lines could still be an issue regardless. Just something to keep an eye on.