Jump to content

ChiTownSnow

Members
  • Posts

    814
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ChiTownSnow

  1. We need a something to eject that secondary wave out earlier to catch up with the primary. Not sure on all the tech speak
  2. Might be close.. I'm sure they have insurance for it.
  3. I was just kidding..i didn't know if they still did that stuff either.
  4. Or u can go all out like the AccuWeather map..
  5. Plumes have a Mean qpf of 0.75 at ORD. But has some of that falling as a mix or rain which brings down the snow total mean. If it stays all snow I would agree 6-10 possible with the higher ratio snow falling at backside.
  6. I'll take the NAM qpf with the GFS track
  7. I want my free car dammit... Throw me a bone.
  8. It's like the snow map is miss aligned from surface map.. seems odd
  9. Pretty good difference in temps. Temps colder with this run
  10. https://www.spc.noaa.gov/exper/sref/srefplumes/ A little early for this I guess.. but Arp-1 please
  11. Idk.. That lake is mighty warm. Not sure how much that might impact it
  12. Seems to have a hard time ejecting out into the plains
  13. Hi res and short range guidance has increased a bit for tonight around N Illinois. Maybe squeeze out an inch or so somewhere
  14. Just eyeballing a roughly 18 hour snow event for Chicago on that run?
  15. Nah..you're just lucky you're good at what you do. Otherwise yes that'd be true.
  16. You don't consider the NAM in short range out west?
  17. Short range NAM vs Long Range was more my point
  18. Getting into NAM range out west. With so many moving parts out west the NAM may be useful
×
×
  • Create New...