Jump to content

Sundog

Members
  • Posts

    10,260
  • Joined

About Sundog

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I would be more impressed with early minimums decades ago when the ice was much more widespread and therefore had more vulnerable ice to give back. Getting an early minimum when all the easy ice is already melted and all we have is a compact core left is not as impressive, it's almost expected. What is impressive is how we continue to shed ice most years despite losing all the vulnerable ice well before the end of the season. Shows you how pathetic the cryosphere has been over the last 15 years.
  2. AGW should be treated as any other insurance scenario. Nobody expects their house to burn down but I bet almost everybody out there (and everyone with a mortgage) has home insurance against several highly unlikely scenarios. Now we're talking about our whole planet, the only place we can call home. It's just a little bit more important than a few walls made of wood and brick yet we are currently playing with matches in a home with no insurance. Even if the uncertainty level regarding AGW was much higher than what it is now, we should still be all doing every damned thing possible to stop any type of GHG emissions. The risk of doing nothing is enormous. The gain even if AGW was not real is having a totally transformed energy economy with countless new jobs that will support it. There are literally no negatives.
  3. Can any natural mechanism explain the dramatic increase increase in temperatures on land and in the oceans over the last few decades? When you show me one that can, let me know.
  4. What hyperbole? Do you need to see iguanas colonize Antarctica to be convinced we have a serious problem?
  5. I can see why earlier minimums can be more common with very low sea ice numbers since all the easy ice to melt is long gone while in more normal extent years there would have still been some vulnerable ice farther from the core to melt out.
  6. We already know the Earth is fine for humans being a couple degrees cooler, because it was before the industrial revolution! I think it's better than doing nothing because we are definitely screwing up the Earth now. Why not at least try to offset the warming effects? Status quo is simply unacceptable.
  7. Honestly, it's better than doing nothing, because that's what we're doing right now, absolutely nothing.
  8. But can't we just "switch it off" so to speak if we see adverse effects?
  9. Isn't it a statistical anomaly to have so many days out for 30 be one specific temperature (89 degrees?)
  10. Teterboro with 10 days is almost twice the next hottest site. Teterboro has been reporting garbage numbers for the last couple of months.
  11. Agree on the 4th of July comment. It's funny too because the 4th is so early in the summer season yet it already feels as if summer is slipping away.
  12. 97 at LGA? I got home from the east end on the north fork around 3:30 and it didn't feel that hot. I guess I got used to it.
  13. Those 89s last year at the park was ridiculous. The record should have been smashed.
×
×
  • Create New...