-
Posts
12,022 -
Joined
-
Last visited
About Brewbeer

- Birthday 01/01/1968
Profile Information
-
Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
KCEF
-
Gender
Male
-
Location:
No Kings Town, USA
-
Interests
Working, drinking, cooking, yard work, skiing sometimes, whitewater canoeing dreaming, sailing again someday, mowing the lawn, raking leaves, snowblowing snow, paying for grown children, cleaning, grocery shopping, home repair & improvement, older car improvement and repair, science, engineering, math, technology, human social progress & justice, whirled peas
-
"data" is the plural form of datum; the grammatically correct scientific usage is "need" the rest of your post is unsubstantiated, same as most of the posts you've made in the subforum
-
if it's registering on the thermometer, it is not fake, it is real nah, we are gonna keep embarrassing you on this subject for as long as you want to persist with being embarrased
-
I'd say that is a cold airmass at night, and a hot airmass during the day. Any other characterization can be considered "fake" to be expected, the air is thin at elevation, negatively affects cognition
-
I think he means his grass
-
if data need to be corrected and aren't, the data are incorrect
-
the reality distortion field is all powerful on Mt. Tolland at least for some, anyway
-
he's just salty 'cause the foliage this year has been great almost everywhere, except for the dullness for The Oaks at Tolland I'd be salty too if the foliage around me was meh and everyone else was enjoying a great season
-
low of 28, some frost
-
Yellow Medicine County, MN - Climate Fact or Climate Fiction?
Brewbeer replied to Cobalt's topic in Climate Change
the science is sound, they don't need to "like" accept OR disprove anything else is delay, deny, distract; it's tiring -
Yellow Medicine County, MN - Climate Fact or Climate Fiction?
Brewbeer replied to Cobalt's topic in Climate Change
why do you believe the methodology they have employed is incorrect? is it because it results in a narrative and call for action that you oppose for unspecified reasons? can you provide some reasonable explanation even if you only have 33% of the data? that's an incredible amount of data, surely there MUST be SOMETHING systemic in the methodology you can point to that is scientifically invalid? your continued evasiveness on this issues is boring -
45/36 this morning, no frost today
-
the metric for "very likely" is 90%; what is the "smashed" metric? is that one week ? are you forecasting a first temp of 32F or lower for Worcester on or after November 19 ?
-
glad we don't live there if you are fortunate today, your travels will take you beyond the dullness of your locale
-
29/28, another frosty one
-
sun is going down and so is the temp, 59/39 antique honda is back in the garage, here are the money shots: it's a touch darker than the original, there's some orange peel and some of the new-to-old-transitions are visible but all-in-all not bad for bondo
