StormChazer

GFS went a touch cooler than the 12Z run, so there is a cooling trend the last couple runs now.

Haha, I was thinking the exact same thing. This is very much a "I don't want to deal with this until tomorrow, so I'll just insert of bunch of agreeable statements that don't actually clear anything up", and like you said, I really don't blame them one bit lol.

Had a local met say just about the same thing last night. In a cloudy, northerly wind filled day, that 32 degree line isn't going back up into Kansas, it's sticking around.

Up to hour 84 and the NAM is doing a number on Oklahoma(much of that is sleet).

Here are my findings from this afternoon's run of the Euro. 10 members give little(under 1-2 in) to no snow for Tulsa and surrounding areas. 9 Near misses or right on the steep snow gradient(2 to 8 inches within a span of 20 miles) 31 Heavy snow runs This is a drastic turn around from last night's euro run both in the master solution and the ensembles. The way I see it as of right now according to the Euro... 20% of little to nothing 18% RIGHT on the line 62% Good, winter storm warning criteria weather

NAM is coming in a little cooler at hour 39 so far, by about 2 degrees.

Here are the Euro ensembles. I'll post an update on my analysis of them for the Tulsa area in a bit.

I'll post the Euro ensembles here shortly. they're out to hour 48 so far.

For those wondering.

Yeah, it's a good run for OK and AR, not so much KS and MO.

There we go!

Wouldn't that give us a colder solution?

Saying hi to everyone! Always nice to get more banter in here!

Not that the Canadian is an outstanding model, but it also trended colder and snowier.

So while the GFS did trend slightly colder, it drops much less precip. Interesting.

GFS looks to be coming in a little colder so far.

I suspected as much. Good to know, thanks!

Btw, I never got a chance to welcome you to the boards! I've dabbled in posts here and there in the past, but this is my first real year of posting alot. Any new faces are welcomed!

It's funny because that doesn't seem like much, but at the same time, that is drastic. Question, do you know if the models in any way play off each other? Like, if the NAM is coming in cold, is there anything in the GFS or Euro's algorithms that take that into account? I would think probably not, as they're entirely separate entities, but it bears asking the question.

Wow!

So it begins.... here is the NAM at 6PM Friday Here is the GFS at 6PM Friday

I went ahead and tallied up the ensembles(not counting control or master) of last night's Euro run. 19 members have Tulsa missing out or getting under 1-2 inches. 12 members put Tulsa RIGHT on that steep gradient(we're talking north Tulsa county gets 8 inches, south Tulsa county gets 1-2 inches), or is within a county away from the high totals. 19 members have Tulsa getting a good dumping of snow. This is the 3rd time I've done this and pretty much we are back to my first analysis where the number was 17 12 21 But no doubt we lost some ensembles in the heavy column to the "right on the line" column. So the way I see it 38% say heavy snow 38% say little to no snow 24% say within 20 miles you go from no snow to 8 inches. I may be biased because I want this snow, but I feel this category has to lean in the heavy snow category's favor, seeing how cold air tends to spread a little more than models think. I'll do another one of these for the 12Z run today.

I've lived in North TX for about 25 years and OK now for 3, and when it comes to winter weather events, they tend to play out nearly identical. I know in my experience, it seems more often that not, that 24 hours or so before the event, everything tends to trend just a little cooler. Probably because the models need to initialize colder and start to pick up on how to handle the cold air just a bit better(which tends to be that it's underestimated the cold air), this usually sees winter storm watches or other advisories bump up an extra line of counties. Once this storm comes on shore, I think we'll get a much better painted picture, and today's NAM runs will be particularly useful since it handles cold air better(the two runs so far have already shown the air is colder than any other models). I'll say this much, every time I can recall that I've ever received a heavy dumping of snow, it's been when the forecast calls for maybe half that, and then the cold air comes in quicker and doubles our totals out of "seemingly" nowhere. I'd love to see the GFS and Euro start a cooling trend today, but frankly, the long range models are always going to struggle with this cold air, it's just the nature of the beast. My eyes are going to start focusing on the NAM here soon.

Do these two usually correlate to each other?

Max range on the NAM, so take it for what it's worth, but this certainly is a much colder solution than every other model.