Jump to content

NEG NAO

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    8,446

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NEG NAO

  1. NEG NAO
    not going with the ICON that is way too north
  2. NEG NAO
    I think the north trend will start at 12Z
  3. NEG NAO
    12Z NAM
  4. NEG NAO
    so you agree with the 0Z EURO amounts ? We should have a forum snow amount contest - we used to do that back in the old days...
  5. NEG NAO
    because of the warm conditions still in place upon the storms arrival and warm ground conditions and time of day this will be falling and progressive nature of this system
  6. NEG NAO
    You just insulted a few METS on this forum............regardless I am still going with a couple slushy inches at the coast more inland where it will be colder - the coast is defined as NYC - Long Island - and the most eastern counties of NJ - the0Z EURO must have had steroids added to it......... almost a foot for NYC ???
  7. NEG NAO
    I myself don't care for heavy wet snow at my advanced age - I still think it will only end up being a couple slushy inches near the coast .........
  8. NEG NAO
    Some will be excited about this - jackpot close to a foot around NYC
  9. NEG NAO
    where did I say storm cancel ? I posted my prediction a few posts back " a slushy couple inches at the coast with more inland.".....
  10. NEG NAO
    you have such a way with words.........
  11. NEG NAO
    we are over 3 days away - watch and see....Walt isn't saying much - enough said...
  12. NEG NAO
    ok fair enough - time will tell...........
  13. NEG NAO
    and it is wrong
  14. NEG NAO
    because its too warm at the start and the seasonal trend so far this year
  15. NEG NAO
    if you are inland - coast will have a slushy couple inches at most
  16. NEG NAO
    you can say that again.........
  17. NEG NAO
    You can say that again
  18. NEG NAO
    shows you how bad this winter has been if you like cold and snow with marginal airmasses during historic prime time in February - this is more like a late March - Early April scenario
  19. NEG NAO
    the Canadian solution at 12Z is the weirdest one
  20. NEG NAO
    I don't think any model is correct with the precip type and amounts at this point for obvious reasons total disagreement
  21. NEG NAO
    weird to say the least..........these models are not receiving the same data
  22. NEG NAO
    is this all your idea ?
  23. NEG NAO
    need a lower pressure more dynamic system passing across the Del Marva at a less progressive pace to give the colder air a chance to infiltrate the storm circulation......
  24. NEG NAO
    this thread was not started by Walt because he is not confident about any significant snow with this "event" and I agree with him so far.....but there is nothing else to track in this boring winter so we might as well track it IMO.....
  25. NEG NAO
    Confusion keeps increasing too - GFS is obviously on its own regarding snowfall amounts - but it makes you wonder since it has been so consistent the last couple of days.....
×
×
  • Create New...