Jump to content

Henry's Weather

Members
  • Posts

    1,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Henry's Weather

  1. You know, I gave you the weenie tag, but you know I zoomed in to try and find how much my hood got. Lol
  2. What people don't understand about an upstream block is that it's essentially squeezing the box of chaos to take up an area in which the probability for a snowstorm is greater. That is all it is
  3. As usual, we are all inhabiting different worlds.
  4. I've stated this several days ago, so it's really excellent to see others agree
  5. I'm not sure what your point is, this is the evolution as forecasted
  6. Ooh, check out that contour signiture north of Alaska. That's some good cross-polar flow right?
  7. The CMC evolution is testament to the strange things that blocks do. Spooky.
  8. This is cool, I'm glad they have a branch which does this sort of greyhound long-term sniffing.
  9. I think my prog is looking pretty good still... even consider Tim Kelly melting for a modeled dec 11 cutter as part of it
  10. Do you think he's aware that he's the unintentional comic relief of an internet forum?
  11. God Mac Jones sucks so bad, I can't believe some people are still holding out for him to return to form. Zappe can actually move the chains.
  12. I truly believe that some people are addicted to pain and anxiety
  13. Guys, who gives a crap about OP for long-range pattern? Do we ever learn?
  14. Obv I am not tip. If NAO is static, determining factors on sensible weather will be highly correlated to the more unstable PNA index, since when you lower degrees of freedom, you can more accurately correlate outcomes to the degrees of freedom that remain (as the entire domain of outcomes is reduced when one degree of freedom is static). In essence, if NAO is taken care of, then indices that are oscillating such as PNA are better for differentiating sensible weather outcomes
  15. In third grade, I wrote a little novel for my teacher (about 40 pages, with size 18ish font if I recall?) about a blizzard which rendered travel impossible for a month, and that sort of apocalyptic scenario. Needless to say, he was concerned but amused.
  16. I will say that I'd like to start a blog a la your stuff at some point, after a few more years of tracking and posting/lurking. You downplay your writing's influence, but I've personally been a fan since about 2017, so I think it's accurate to state that your process has influenced my thinking somewhat, especially with regards to pattern recognition as opposed to the more technical specific processes which still elude me. You've mentioned getting at forecasting through a information synthesis and identifying relevant structures/patterns style as opposed to starting from the mechanistic level and working your way up. I think I have a similar process, meaning that I enjoy learning about specific mechanisms as they are entrained within larger, more qualitative schemata
  17. I read a lot of your shit so probably has some influence on my process/pattern recog.
  18. I'm feeling the spirit, so I'm going to make a proclamation (especially since the pope seems to be absent, gotta step up): I am about 80% confident that there will be significant EC cyclogenesis during the period from Dec 16 to Dec 21. Prior to that, I think there will be a lower impact storm, probably an inland/NNE event (btween Dec 12-14) which forms a 50-50 low that will entrain future cyclogenesis to the east coast, as well as **brings the baroclinic zone farther south**. I'm not a professional nor a seasoned forecaster, so I only stand to gain reputation or to retain my rank as a member of the "Weenie" class. Dec 12th/13th storm: - coincident with PNA positive delta Dec 10-12 - Coincident with NAO retrograte from Greenland to Davis Strait - poor antecendent airmass/lack of well-positioned baroclinic zone leads to angst for EMATT weenies In between: - renewal of cold - establishment of favorable baroclinic zone - establishment of favorable confluence For December 16-21 storm: This will be the storm that occurs as Pac ridging that starts near the 10th peaks and begins to disintegrate. Things could go wrong, disclaimers, allegedly-speak, yada yada. I think that this is a period with high potential. If I were to guess storm evolution, I would predict something southern-stream, sort of like a Dec 2009 deal. The coincidence of ridge peaking and decaying with NAO decaying and retrograding is very promising. I accept any weenie tags thrown my way, and it will be fun to verify my prophecy. If the pope is gone, i sorta feel like a deranged and less coherent Martin Luther, yet instead of nailing my theses to the door of a church, I am scrawling in red crayon my manic and redbull-fueled ramblings all over the walls of the hallowed halls housing the northeastern American weather intelligentsia. Fun fact: Martin Luther was constipated for most of his life. This is another differentiator: my access to diuretics, as hinted at above, sets me apart from Martin Luther in this specific dimension
  19. I think what's super interesting is blocking decay/reload patterns. How a block decays and retrogrades or doesn't retrograde. You have a great point about how absolute anomalies are not indicative of dynamic interactions, like the kind of dynamic interaction that Archambault looks at. What would be cool is to look at the coincidence of NAO/AO Westward decay and a PNA spike (positive delta) (there's probably literature out there about that), simply because that's a signal that's being born out in the ensembles for mid-Dec.
×
×
  • Create New...