Jump to content

Henry's Weather

Members
  • Posts

    1,572
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Henry's Weather

  1. Would be cool to see a true rain to pounding snow event... not common these days
  2. Yes, it's a balance between maintaining credibility and giving crews enough time. Logistically speaking, this winter has not required much salt and the like, so maybe less time is needed
  3. "Objective" is different than being responsible for damage-control. The NWS can't forecast a snowy solution for borderline areas because they are responsible for public works' mobilization, not because they are strictly following guidance. Strict adherence to guidance = "objective", only yields a snowier forecast than the one they put out. They are more conservative not for the purpose of fundamental accuracy, but for risk management at this distance
  4. Such a cool system, stepping aside from IMBY insecurities. Pinwheels and pinwheels
  5. It is nice though to see that we still certainly need highly discerning meteorologists to interpret computer outputs.
  6. My God, I'd hate to have to make a forecast for the general public on this one.
  7. All in all, we can see that the envelope of possibilities is still very wide. Going to probably be another 24 hours before more clarity emerges
  8. Verbatim, that's a bunch of CCB all the way back to the river, perhaps even further
  9. I'm just happy I predicted the run to run change. Still the long range nam!
  10. Notice the difference. Less amped and more separated = later phase = not ran up the gullet
×
×
  • Create New...