Henry's Weather

Consensus 4-8”+ albany to the coast, euro caved to gfs, Nashua (where I think you are?) is in a prime location. Contentious about NW extend of the goods and the r/s line (NW of Plymouth or not, and duration)

Book it… sorry Tblizz

Is this basically a bunch of simulations based on the relationship between GFS forecast data and observations?

SREF?

What the hell are you guys talking about?

A clear and damning trend

And even though the poles heat faster, as temp increases, the same delta T is a larger delta kinetic energy increase? Which means that delta Kinetic energy is higher, which means that the motive force for redistributing kinetic energy is higher -> faster circulation?

Mechanistically, how would CC cause a faster flow? Simply more kinetic energy available due to higher temps globally?

Yeah, reality can be negative for sure. Probably needs out-letting somewhere, relatively harmless to do so (not saying you do it in particular) on an online weather forum.

Better to be negative on here than with loved ones I bet

There isn’t the same disruption/collosus gravity as the big ones, but I love a good 4-8 storm or 3-6. The big ones take a huge emotional toll that doesn’t always pay off. The hard thing is that we never get those 3-6 deals anymore. It’s all coastals now

New NAM certainly has a slightly better orientation and more time to come up the coast. Verbatim will still miss

I’m not necessarily opposed to issuing alerts about high-potential systems far in advance. I’m sure it wasn’t intended to be similar in kind to the NWS’s old blizzard watches. No clue if this guy sucks or whatever, but I feel like the idea is fine

The solution to these terrible disappointments is to literally mot care about OP runs outside of 100 hrs. If those depictions had no emotional resonance, we wouldn’t be experiencing this disappointment, bc the ens means were always potentially promising but not honking “storm!!”

Sounds ominous…