BooneWX

Well their justification is that you’ll get downsloped as the meso low pulls away, which is logical, but I think my point is that undersells the meso low. The accumulation will have already happened by then for the most part. As soon as we slack on flow, it’s a downsloping issue all the way to charlotte. It doesn’t discount the thumping that happens before then.

Shorty get down, good Lord Baby got 'em up open all over town Strictly biz, she don't play around Cover much grounds, got game by the pound .

If you want to have some fun. Ask AI how big the drifts would be if you had a foot of snow and 30 mph gusts. Go on, don’t wait.

Yall aren’t seeing a lee side minimum. We have upslope flow and a strong easterly fetch off a meso low. You’re seeing models show subsidence from intense banding on the edge of the foothills and piedmont. You can’t expect models to accurately resolve that or lee side enhancement at this range.

They’ll know local enhancement factors the best

The nam has a well known dry bias

It’s out to lunch on ratios. Gives me 3” at 10:1 but 4.7” on the kuchera. Easily 6” at 20:1.

You can see the SLP enhancement as the band pivots back west before scooting out on the 3k

Gotta ignore the 12k. Feedback issues painfully evident in the surface output.

Gonna be honest, I really doubt some of these models on the slp placement. Seems more logical that it’ll be on the edge of the gulf stream closer to the coast, which would enhance us as well with the easterly fetch.

It doesn’t hammer as hard this run but I’d take my chances with the footprint it shows. Much more expansive, cohesive coverage.

Would yall get off pivotal so it’ll run faster?

I can’t believe we’re 31 pages deep in January

Little bit of a punch to the nuts to hear them express doubt about totals along I40, but we press on. You may be ground zero!!

Been locked in for days too! And a reminder that it’s a 10:1 output. We may double that.