With regard to info forecasts and much more discussion of the particular and sometimes extreme different scenarios possible On forecasts and much more detail discussion on how the odds for different scenarios are changing as we close in on the day of a weather event we could do better On This board. The general public is generally 2 stupid and ignorant and uninterested in hearing or accurately processing that kind of forecast .
its like this , we need a better breakdown of the options the weather (forecast) could take , and a running discourse on how options are becoming more or less likely as we get inside the 24-36 hour window when the details and probability of such options can be fine tuned . A lot of us ..We are stat guys, percentage guys .
what bugs me is 24-36 hours out from a system the minor model changes which begin to fine tune the different “paths” or risks or callem’ “caution flags” could be much more discussed. There is 100% a psychological component to this bc in winter people only talk about said changes when it turns snowier/ more bullish on the immediate lead up, not on the opposite. There’s also an aspect of wanting to keep things “AWT”.
i really enjoy how laid back this subforum is and it Mets will sort of discuss a better breakdown of what we’re lookin for for different scenarios to play out when asked directly (like ORH wxman) , just seems like could be better details in general discussion of the options . John seems to add this most (in general discussion) thou seems more often to play devils advocate (not complaining)