Jump to content

Chicago Storm

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    18,730
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chicago Storm

  1. Both Pac and Gulf, but much more-so Gulf.
  2. EPS are far different than the GEFS. EPS spread is far less, and most are noteworthy.
  3. Would be very true in many cases. However with this one, moisture transport is Pac supplied, not Gulf.
  4. when are they not. their 'local tools and techniques' are always hoppin'.
  5. PIA area surprised, with several 2-3” reports. .
  6. Widespread 2-4" reports in the QC area, as snow comes to an end.
  7. 0.5" at MDW as of noon...Not bad for there actually.
  8. Waves within the mean trough are less strung out, and have more positive interaction.
  9. Yea, that's one issue in this sub-forum. There has been plenty of big events in the region this season, but they've been up north where we have few posters.
  10. Trend the past few runs has actually been less strung out. .
  11. Seeing pictures of ~1” in the PIA area, which bodes well for N IL. .
  12. i’ve said it before and will say it again, please pay my next speeding ticket. i’m due for one. .
  13. Agree. Trend this winter is for a the last wave coming down the backside of the trough to try and dig into the west, and it gets left behind a bit. That is where the GFS went that run. Even the Euro solution, albeit snowy, is also strung out.
  14. better find a ride for tomorrow, slick. .
  15. they don’t even know how to drive in the rain. .
  16. Yea, this shouldn’t be a surprise. First event, even if under criteria, usually gets a headline. If some of the snowier guidance works out, some places will be advisory criteria anyway. .
×
×
  • Create New...