I see no use in getting bent out of shape regarding things, given the whole system is flawed… -EF scale -Damage indicators -What can/can’t be used for ratings -NWS office issues* *By this I mean there are several issues within the NWS that factor in, such as… ~Staffing issues at times leading to not all potential tornadoes being survey, or at least not all potential tornadoes being surveyed in a proper manner. ~Particular mets within certain offices that do not care whether or not all potential tornadoes are surveyed, or at least do not care about the substantial amount of QLCS spin-ups that occur. ~Offices that are too worried about verification scores, instead of getting the surveyed information correct. .