Chicago Storm
-
Posts
18,358 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Blogs
Forums
American Weather
Media Demo
Store
Gallery
Everything posted by Chicago Storm
-
pretty much.
-
a ton of latent heat release.
-
you used to be better at trolling than this. it's a shame.
-
you apparently were not around for the 1-3"/hour snowfall rates in northeast illinois a few nights ago, without arctic air.
-
this might be the new dumbest thing you've said.
-
Good point. Appears to be the weakest of any OP guidance.
-
Definitely faster, but only a tick north.
-
18z NAM looks to be headed north and faster.
-
getting there.
-
rings a bell.
-
must be getting old... don't remember any of this.
-
que it up. .
-
12z EPS Mean... .
-
There are numerous ENS (both GFS and Euro) that have 10-20”, with a few over 20”. .
-
And indeed that's how it will continue. Bump SE of 6z run and bump NW of 0z run. So call it even.
-
Slower timing makes it look worse than it is. In any case, a bump SE is a bump SE. It's actually a bump NW from the 0z run, just a bump SE from the 6z run.
-
12z Euro might bump SE. Northern stream lobe is a bit more favorable than 0z run...However, heights are a bit lower ahead of southern trough, and it is slower and more positive tilt prior to ejection.
-
Only change on 12z Euro through 36hrs is that the northern stream lobe is a bit further east. Everything else, including heights in ahead of southern trough, are unchanged.
-
can't wait for GFS ENS P22 to occur.
-
Exactly. Additionally...In an alternate universe where the storm system was suppressed far enough south where IND ended up in the heart of the snow swath, it would be a sub-par event.
-
you’re still not in the game, champ. .
-
UKMET has gone from a weak event just north of I-70, to an I-88 crusher, and now back to a north of I-70 good hit...in the span of 4 model cycles. Wouldn’t really consider that a model of consistency or trending. .
-
Main wave ejecting out was also much slower and a bit more loose. .
-
**** that guy, he’s never right.
-
can’t happen. i’ve been told it’s way too marginal. that’s not fully LE in that image though obviously.
