Jump to content

Chicago Storm

Professional Forecaster
  • Posts

    18,319
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chicago Storm

  1. you at least used to do a better job than this. obviously past your prime. .
  2. Valid. I'm not even fully sold for here as of yet, even though trends have been more favorable overall. I'd probably go 1-3" along/north of I-88 for now.
  3. The GEM makes sense when you look under the hood. SLP doesn’t really deepen until it’s passing NE of the area. WAA doesn’t take off until east as well, and 850’s are actually out of the west of a period of time. On the flip side, the GFS has good snows further south for a different reason. It has the SLP strengthening sooner, with more WAA sooner and further west. However, the further south track helps bring the good snows further south. .
  4. GFS is good too though. 12z GEM bumped south. .
  5. Another bump on GEFS Mean. Still a lot of spread though. .
  6. 12z GFS a bit colder and snowier. 12” just north of cyclone. .
  7. Given the NAM is further north and more meh, that’s not surprising. .
  8. 0z EPS Mean a bit behind the GEFS, but still not terrible. It did bump south. .
  9. 0z GEFS Mean. Several ENS have 3-6” around here, with a few 6”+. Even one with 12”+ across N IL. .
  10. Decent agreement on a 1-3” event along/north of I-88 in the area. We’ll see how things trend... .
  11. 1.63” of liquid in what was a 13” depth yesterday, at ORD. .
  12. you have a long way to go before knowing how things work around here. .
  13. ORD up to 9.9”. Though possibly with an *. 11.0” MDW, 6.8” RFD and 12.7” LOT. .
  14. it’s not dumb to be discussing futility in late december when that far below average and with that little on the season/for the month. the least snowiest december was in play all of the way up until the end of the month. and people do obviously care if they are discussing it. for folks around here it was the only thing to discuss at the time. i personally didn’t partake surprisingly though.
×
×
  • Create New...