its not a valid scientific comparison. When all the other data uses airports, having New York City use a park thats overfoliated makes it an apples to oranges comparison- it simply doesn't work. The data is flawed in the sense that the ASOS there does not adhere to policies that the equipment has to be a certain distance away from foliage.
The ridiculous aspect of all this is Central Park was 5 degrees cooler than JFK even when JFK had a strong southerly wind (a sea breeze.) It just isn't valid for a variety of reasons. If everyone else uses an airport, New York City must use airport data too.