Jump to content

Hoosier

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    47,183
  • Joined

Everything posted by Hoosier

  1. Noticed something interesting in Chi metro. Go west to DPA and they currently aren't reporting precip despite radar being lit up like a Christmas tree. Currently 30/20 at DPA.
  2. It may have already been snowing when I made that other post. I hadn't looked outside for about 15 mins prior to that.
  3. Changeover taking a little longer to happen than most models indicated around here.
  4. Probably. If those kind of totals occur with the progged parameters, that would be pretty impressive. I think the main system would have to shift north to get over 20" in Cook.
  5. It's been cold seemingly forever up until today. I don't think it's that much of a factor.
  6. I came north for that one. I recall it being drizzle/light prior to changing over. This is full on moderate rain now.
  7. Seems like the heaviest axis came north? Just going off of memory.
  8. Been raining good. I'd have to think on it but can't recall this amount of rain right before as big of a snowstorm as this looks to be. Usually it's more drizzly/light if it occurs.
  9. Was looking at some forecast soundings for Thursday in the LOT cwa and there's a pretty deep isothermal layer around -10C to -12C, which is right on the edge for getting good dendrites. But a lot of the lift is higher up. Ratios will be above 10:1 but there's not the greatest dgz/omega alignment.
  10. Good stuff and reason for optimism on the northern fringe. Question is if it can overcome the feed of dry air.
  11. Given the overall state of the models and now getting into hi-res range, and with added lake contribution, I am pretty confident in at least a foot for downtown Chicago. Certainly a higher ceiling than that though depending on things like banding and just how significant the lake can contribute.
  12. Actually, the 18" max is only through Wed night.
  13. Looks like LOT has around 18" max in the forecast for parts of the cwa. But we want at least 20, don't we?
  14. Haven't done an extremely detailed comparison but the current placement of the rain band seems to be on the northern end of guidance at the very least.
  15. Let's all go to the new thread now: https://www.americanwx.com/bb/topic/56747-feb-1-3rd-ghd-iii-part-3/
  16. It's worked in the past with prior GHD storms though.
  17. Every member on the 15z SREF is above 10" for GYY, with a big cluster between 14-21" or so.
  18. 18z NAM may try to come north with main low.
  19. Could be overdone, but it's not implausible. I think we're gonna come in over 15"
  20. When I was in LAF and we had 17" in the Feb 2007 storm, I recall there being 10 foot drifts in the outlying areas.
  21. Yes indeed. Mentioned that last night. This isn't really a case of the models simply being too wet just because. The evolution of key features changed.
  22. Do you have any thoughts on the lake enhancement potential in the area? I don't want to say the parameters are God awful the whole time, but... lol Inversion height get pretty shallow at times, like 4k feet with considerable drying just above. Sufficient delta T up to that level though. Seems like the most aggressive guidance may be overdone. Thoughts?
×
×
  • Create New...