That would be a race against time for Chicago to fit the technical definition of a white Christmas per 00z Euro, though I guess having snow falling at any time would be satisfactory for the masses.
That is not a terrible comparison at the surface and aloft. The very big difference though is what you mentioned about the thermal profiles being colder, even though that was 7 weeks earlier in the season.
Well the good news is that the upcoming pattern may lay down some snow up north. So may have to suffer for a while but it could end up being for the greater good.
Getting snow up north first is important for our purposes -- you'd much rather have it than not -- but you seem to be making it out to be an absolute requirement unless I'm misunderstanding you. I would disagree.
Flipping through that run, very noticeable how jumpy the NAM is with the surface low (due to all the convection in the Gulf) even though it eventually ends up in the general agreed upon area.
lol I like that phrase
Don't want to give false hope, but just think it's possible that the changeover is undermodeled. Just need relatively minor tweaks in the grand scheme. Even if that is the case, accumulations could still be hurt by the relatively warm bl temps.
Digging into the thermal profiles, it seems that the problem is less at 850 mb than from about 925 mb to the surface. Granted we just don't have much cold air to work with, but there's a zone where 850's drop below 0C while 925 mb to the surface is above freezing, so the models are showing rain. The models could be right and the low level warmth is simply too much to overcome for much of a changeover, but imo that is more of a "fixable" issue than having to get below 0C 850 mb temps to materialize out of nowhere.
If my research is right, Boston has officially gotten 40"+ in a 21 day period in just 7 different years (1978, 1994, 1996, 2003, 2005, 2011, 2015). Tells me 2 things... it is not that common but Boston has been spoiled rotten recently.
I mentioned this last night but this trough for the late week storm is pretty bonkers. Here are a couple maps from the GFS. The first one shows 500 mb height anomalies. As you can see, the scale is maxed out in Alabama. The second map shows 500 mb normalized height anomalies, which basically gives an idea of how far out of the norm something is (anomaly ÷ standard deviation). Again quite impressive. The takeaway is that it's pretty unusual to see such low 500 mb heights that far south.
Whether this translates into something good for our region is another matter, but kinda cool if you appreciate the meteorology.
The anomalies on the trough/closed low in the deep South are pretty impressive. I'm almost wondering if there's so much energy diving south/east if the surface low tries to make a move toward I-95/east coast. Not saying it happens but just one of the things that could go wrong besides the problematic thermal profiles.
Who knows if it will verify or not, but the GFS has a 500 mb jet max of 150 kts on the east coast with that storm late week. That is about as strong as it gets.
Lately it seems so difficult to have a nice cold/snowy stretch starting a week or two before Christmas AND HOLD through the 25th. I can't even remember the last time it happened around here. 2010? Maybe before that? Last year was nice in that it snowed on Christmas Eve, but talk about getting saved at the last minute. December 2016 started out good but the 25th was mild and the snow rapidly melting.
Good posts guys. Does look like a La Nina flavor to the pattern and sustained wintry conditions may be hard to come by for a bit (except perhaps northern tier).
When I get about 20 miles south of here.
I'm only partially joking. It's a different makeup politically and even the accent has some differences. Growing up and spending many years of my life in the Chicago metro area, I have a Chicago flavor in my voice.
I would definitely say Kentucky is more like the South than not.