Jump to content

StormchaserChuck!

NO ACCESS TO PR/OT
  • Posts

    2,273
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by StormchaserChuck!

  1. 74-75 I think was a La Nina with +PNA. La Nina's are pretty rigid because they strengthen the mid-latitude jet, less land-ocean variance. I'm just saying, in the subsurface this one is not a La Nina. 

  2. 4 hours ago, psuhoffman said:

    You can’t just decide to define a Nina differently. The point you’re making about the oddity and abnormal (non nina) behavior is very valid but by the way we define a Nina it was a Nina. This is irrelevant since we have almost none of the oddities that causes 1995/6 to behave antithetical too a canonical Nina. 

    Go out and measure Pacific equilatoral SSTs in December..

  3. 5 hours ago, Maestrobjwa said:

    And folks tell me there's no magic formula for prediction...lol Perhaps not for the other ENSO states, but for Nina? I mean 95-96 is the only outlier! I mean I guess there's enough chaos for something randomore to happen, but...ninas seem to be the most predictable around here...

    A lot of people don't know this, but 95-96 was not a La Nina as per ENSO subsurface, 0.0.  Plus 90-91,91-92,92-93-93-94-94-95,97-98 were all +ENSO 7/8 years. 95-96 was +PNA. 

×
×
  • Create New...