No...I said I was sticking with my call. To this point this has been a good example of not model or more specifically snow map hugging. Have to know your climo in these types of events and then watch how the QPF distribution plays out. I know you watch the thermals which obviously means everything in one sense, but keeping them or losing them really results in us getting say closer to 2" or potentially making a run at 4".
My rule of thumb is this: we lose thermals quicker than modeled, we keep ground temps longer than modeled. I constantly remind myself to expect more ice and less snow. This is making an assumption that we have CAD, which we will. There are exceptions and nuances with every event to be sure, but the above works out well for me way more often than it lets me down.