Jump to content

Itstrainingtime

Members
  • Posts

    18,579
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Itstrainingtime

  1. Great point. There's no "bad" time for a snowstorm, but mid to late December is perfect for several reasons, including staying power.
  2. GFS looks beautiful! The southern edge is oh so close to the border which scares the crap out of me. Big day tomorrow - will it be boom or bust down this way...
  3. Years ago (as in at least 20-25) a recently retired met from MU made a call for like 0"-24" for Lanco. People thought he was a coward for putting out a range that incredulous...it ended up being almost spot on. Our proximity to the ocean and not having a chain of mountains surrounding us can break hearts all too often. That same proximity to the big pond can pay huge dividends though, too.
  4. That would have been me. I actually made a couple of editions to update on new posters. It's still posted, probably on page 2 of our main page by now.
  5. I enjoyed reading your posts on the other weather forum. You are always welcome and I encourage you to post here.
  6. After many, many years...she just knows the drill by now. What bothers her more is what happens AFTER the storm. I usually spend about a day in depression after many days of hunting. She doesn't understand the emotional toll of following something for a week and then letting it go.
  7. I can't see it making that big of an adjustment either way at this point?
  8. Not by a lot, but the GFS is east. For those riding the fence, not by a lot can mean a whole lot. And, like the NAM, the trend has stopped at 18z.
  9. Eh, just call it "AA" for short. Perusing other forums, there's lots of bickering going on. Ah...snow brings out the best in all of us. And when it doesn't snow, well...
  10. Someone smarter than me needs to explain this. Lancaster's expected snowfall is 13". Yet, the chances of Lancaster seeing more than 12" is 46%? What am I missing?
  11. I said last Saturday I liked the I 81 corridor and Cashtown to jack...going down with the gail-force storm.
  12. Yes, and this is what our buddy PSUhoffman has been talking about all day. We can still be okay BUT we needed the north/west trend to stop, and stop with the 18z suite. At least on the 18z NAM, it did just that. Right now, that's exactly what we wanted and all we could hope for.
  13. I think CTP mentioned the possibility of banding tomorrow night with 2-4"/hour rates quite possible.
  14. I'm better than fine with that. When is the last time that everyone who posts in this thread got at least 1' from the same storm? Even Clearfield is 1' on that map. 13" of ice/snow = very satisfied. Please quote this post tomorrow evening when I'm complaining about sleet.
  15. No, we didn't start a thread specific to this storm. We did back in January 2016 and that worked out pretty well. This storm seems likely to be a true divider in our sub with areas near UNV looking at perhaps 20" while southern parts of York and Lancaster might see 1/4 of that.
  16. Yes, I don't think they took areas outside of their viewership area into account. I hope not at least. Any model showing DC getting 3"+ is showing 15" or more for me...just saying.
  17. Sorry, you misunderstood, I wasn't being critical. My point was that the storm WAS both west AND east at different time stamps.
  18. So what Nut is saying is...unless you guessed north or south, you win!
  19. I can't read. Ground truth looks to have moved westward.
  20. I'm not seeing that but I'm old. To me this looks tucked with heavy snows to Pittsburgh.
×
×
  • Create New...