Jump to content

StormyClearweather

Members
  • Posts

    617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StormyClearweather

  1. Would you mind posting the 10:1 as well? Just want to see how they compare.
  2. 12/20: Snow shower - trace 12/24: Mulch topper 1/3: 0.3” 1/6: 7.3” 1/11: 1.8” 1/14: Trace - late evening snow shower 1/16: .5" 1/19: 1.9" 2/8: .1” Total: 11.9” *edit for typo on date
  3. So do you think the second wave would be a "hit" per the NAM? Or is this the path to failure @psuhoffman mentioned yesterday?
  4. Yeah HRRR is DRRRY. I don't take it too seriously either way, but it did seem to do well for the Thursday event re: QPF (for MBY and for Baltimore, where I was at the time, anyway).
  5. So am I crazy, or was the GFS the first to nail this one starting several days ago? I mean, I guess it hasn't technically nailed anything since it could still be a nothing burger, but our little GooFuS is never consistent, except when it's consistently wrong. I admit I haven't followed this "event" too closely, so maybe I'm wrong.
  6. Just saw two 9" reports come in from Lafayette. Wild for them. Hell, that'd be wild for many of us these days.
  7. We're going to see more and more of this: https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/21/media/local-meteorologists-allen-media-weather-channel/index.html I just hope NWS/NOAA isn't next.
  8. Low of 10, currently 18.
  9. 11.7 with a DP of -.8. Not bad!
  10. 12/20: Snow shower - trace 12/24: Mulch topper 1/3: 0.3” 1/6: 7.3” 1/11: 1.8” 1/14: Trace - late evening snow shower 1/16: .5" 1/19: 1.9" Total: 11.8"
  11. @stormtrackerRadar looking good over you right now - hope you're about to get blasted
  12. Oh I know, but I like that the QPF minimums are .4 for most of us, which is not too shabby. But I realize it's wrong because RGEM.
  13. EPS bumped QPF for many by about .10. I know we're getting to the range where it doesn't matter as much, but it doesn't hurt either!
×
×
  • Create New...