Jump to content

jewell2188

Members
  • Posts

    564
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by jewell2188

  1. I commented on DT “first call” and basically said his map won’t even come close to verifying for the majority of the DMV, he of course insults and I told him to reply back tomorrow when he finally realizes that his numbers are way off. The guy literally is a joke.
  2. Actually sad to hear about sue at fox5. I grew up watching sue, Doug hill, Ryan, and topper. All the originals slowly disappearing. RIP Doug hill!!!!
  3. Highly doubt given the track that’s accurate. I think it’s safe to say at this point it’s going to end up a slop fest.
  4. I mean the majority of the area could use a good soaking.
  5. Regardless of the airmass, doesn’t this map just look off given the track??? I find it hard to believe with a shitty track we even receive half of this….
  6. So what your saying is the likely hood of significant snow for the majority is not likely and the chances of it going back in our favor is closing fast?
  7. DT will ride his Richmond snowstorm until the first drop of rain falls.
  8. The real question is what kind of BS is DT going to spill tomorrow? I’m sure he’ll blame Covid.
  9. Ehh I had 85 hours in a truck last week between the two storms, not complaining for a little break.
  10. Is this the year of last minute adjustments to give the area a decent storm?
  11. Rather be in the 60’s the days leading up to a 6-12 incher versus 20’s and low 30’s for highs and no snow lol. Heck we pulled it off earlier in the week!!!!
  12. Unless radar fills in, majority of the rain shield looks to be west of 81 I think anyone in the immediate nova/DC area expecting more than an inch are going to be highly disappointed. Maybe some isolated higher amounts but current radar depiction doesn’t look good if your rooting for a lot of rain.
  13. I would say yes. At roughly $16 billion i would think improvements have been made. From the reports some areas outside the levee protection are bad but areas within are okay. The real question is a storm that sustains long term cat 3-4 strength how will that investment stand up? Again maybe I’m putting to much thought into it but i think it’s a legit conversation.
  14. Makes sense. Always have been curious about this. I think it would be an interesting study for sure. You would thing a long sustained cat 3-4 traversing the gulf prior to landfall would produce much more damage especially storm surge compared to a storm strengthening to a cat 3-4 or 5 right at landfall.
  15. Maybe someone can Collaborate…we all know this was never Katrina…..but to my knowledge Katrina was extremely strong long before landfall. Is there a difference between a hurricane with long sustained strength compared to a hurricane strengthening prior to landfall? I’ve always been under the impression that a hurricane strengthening prior to landfall sometimes doesn’t always translate to ground conditions compared to a storm with long sustained strength.
  16. The nam typically is overdone with precip amounts. But even 1-3 for the majority of the area may cause problems.
  17. Ryan reeves put out a response to the Tom Wilson and rangers Incident this past season and how he would have responded to it…..long story short reeves it’s such a mediocre player compared to Tom Wilson it’s not even funny. I can’t stand the fact he thinks his play on the ice is even decent….
  18. Highly doubt the FFW verifies for majority of the area.
  19. The same areas hit hard the other night are in-line again. I’m only frustrated because where I’m located we could use every bit of it. Grass is still crunchy! I miss mowing lol
×
×
  • Create New...