I know it's not really comparing apples to apples but the radar right now (seems) to look a lot better than progged fx radars at this hour from the NAM/HRRR and other models.
Alot of the obs are light though some a couple SNs
That's just that panel though later frames when its snowing aren't so bad. Its still good for most but what ive noticed is the heavy axis of snowfall/banding has shifted 10-20 miles SE every single run for the past 5 runs
I think its definitely going to take time to get going especially on the roads. Probably lose our first inch or so that falls just to melting, even on non paved surfaces.
I really like this Enhanced Data Display that the NWS came out with but it's been "Experimental" for like 5 years now or as long as i can remember.
CF just off to our NW (of the state)
Based only off whats out so far the Candian Centre Progs it doesnt look too much different from 12Z to me, still a good hit for CT. Still on the higher side of things too it would seem.
lol, just thinking about that. Where are my warnings.
to be frank, the advisories are a stretch and the nws knows it, mostly for timing/impacts as we mentioned.
A couple inches or so (2-3) here was all i was really expecting from the start, that happens ill be satisfied.
But yes i can't wait for this little turd to flush down the toilet so we can start tracking something real.
That's exactly what they said in the disco actually. It's sub advisory pretty much everywhere. Timing is bad but i don't think roads will be as i said before. I'm pretty certain that 91 and 95 will be just wet. Side streets esp in hilly terrain have issues if we can get some good banding.
Is this the latest criteria that you're aware of?