It does, just speaking in general terms...meaning that it doesn't really give me much confidence if it adds weight, or lack thereof, to the other globals.
I’ve heard dirty water before but not the other one.
I work at a retail shop on south Main Street
32f the whole way here until I hit Waterbury it got up to 33 and 34 now here 270ft
Crepon said that Boyle taught them in his class, they did some labs and stuff with it etc...
It's a good tool everyone forecasting should use it, trouble with it though you can only use American models, GFS, NAM 3k etc.
Which is a damn shame, i had to learn about how to use bufkit through friends at school, asking questions online and trial and error and just becoming familiar with it over the years...
There should be an entire semester course on BUFKIT imo, you could easily fill up the whole time with everything you can do with that tool.
Coolwx on the other hand plots omega with actual temperature, 0C, -12C and -18C...between -12 and -18 is supposed to be the optimal region where you want high omega.
Right, temp. It's not the actual temperature, but the optimal temperatue for snow growth. So you want those numbers (temperature) to line up with the best lift (omega) + RH. This is my understanding of it, someone can correct me if im wrong.
Imagine if that was all snow!!!! This would be 40-50" easy! And with temps in the teens you can automatically add 30:1 ratios for the entire event. This would yield 120-150". Throw in some good banding and thundersnow and would we probably be at around 200" and that's being very conservative.