Jump to content

Maestrobjwa

Members
  • Posts

    10,247
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Maestrobjwa

  1. Teased by what, exactly? If ya believed in 12-18"...that may have been your interpretation of that that teased you...
  2. Yeah no other model has been transferring that late...so it appears to be on an island.
  3. I think we even had that in Jan 2016! I mean everything went about as perfectly as it can go for that storm!
  4. Wouldn't let my mind go there if I were you...and just remember it's the ICON, lol Let's just see what happens in the next suite...then we can discuss blip or trend
  5. So I guess the only "rug getting pulled out" scenario would be a further west track at this point?...
  6. Yeah and so far the high moving away too quickly hasn't been too much of an issue on the rest of the guidance...
  7. Darn...don't wanna see that become a thing...
  8. That was a golden week right there...ain't never seen consensus from like 7-8 days out be that rock-steady!
  9. #Jan2016...aka easiest tracking ever. But it's kinda rare!
  10. Even if ya cut that in half for the usual caveats...what would that be...8"+ even for the cities?
  11. Now what would have to happen to make it go a tad SE?Just a little less amped on Wednesday? (or is this a double-edged sword...and that we don't want less amped because ya want the rates?)
  12. And add to that the possibility of CAD being undermodeled (as it sometimes is)...and that's a pretty great run!!
  13. Warning level is my bar too...I haven't had one verify imby since 2016, so...I'd take 5-8"! I am curious about what the ceiling will be though...
  14. Looks like it follows the @psuhoffman theory!
  15. Good!! Amp that baby up to help with Wednesday!
  16. Yeah he was being mostly sarcastic with that comment...lol
  17. Could you elaborate a bit more (not that you haven't already done a lot elaborating of course!) about how the stonger CAD signature would impact on what you just mentioned about with the "warm nose" this run of the euro showed?
  18. So this run was more about track than any other factor?
  19. Now with the 1035 high overhead...is the track what caused the slightly warmer solution?
  20. But I mean...at this point tho...according to your theory, shouldn't we be kinda rooting against a snowier solution for this wave anyway? Lol
  21. Uh...would you mind translating that a bit? Need what system to trend south of what now? Lol
  22. I think @psuhoffman was saying it was the opposite: that we want more amped to lower heights (still not entirely clear on what "heights" are, but I digress, lol). We want lower heights for a colder Wednesday system, I think.
×
×
  • Create New...