yes, i think thats the proper wording. Of what results were processed and results released, we have a high rate. correct.
sorry.. my scientific brain can only handle so much semantics lol
Most likely, yes.
we will never have a true scope of numbers until its over. until they test people for it afterwards. until then we have to make do with what is published, but there is always a lag in the data. always always always.
but they weren't run yesterday. stop saying that.
its not an accurate picture of the true spread in the state. its not an accurate picture of the true mortality rate. its the only data we have, but everyone needs to understand there are lags in when results come back. both positive and negative.
just be careful when doing that math. we know there is a lag on when people get tested and when the results come back. its not accurate based on real-time
i didn't see any attacks against you, showme. she was arguing against the articles that you posted. that is not an attack against you.
not sure how to handle this situation as i did not find her posts to be off-based or wrong.
^^ that post goes for everyone. Its a thin line to walk between what is covid talk and what gets into the political weeds. complaining about it in a banter thread does no good what so ever. you need to report posts so we moderators see specifically the issues.
this goes for any thread, at any time. i'm not about to hunt down posts that people bitch about in another thread