Ha, its okay. I was kidding. I've forgotten about you too before (won't do it again )
But yeah, so far so good. I'd like to see the GFS have some higher qpf totals like the NAM had.
for sure. I wasn't trying to say that they were wrong, just that they shouldn't be take verbatim as a forecast to what any given location will received. lot more goes into forecasting snow totals than a digital snowmap
Or, you use the snow map as just another tool to forecast. ratios depend on temperature, where the dg zone is etc. snow maps shouldn't be used as a standalone thing to make forecasts.
you're welcome to let me know what is considered short, medium and long range and I'd be happy to update how the threads are named instead of making snide comments about it.