Jump to content

JasonOH

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by JasonOH

  1. From the damage assessment toolkit. Bassfield EF4 was 2 miles wide
  2. Great twitter thread about the NWS warning process for at embedded supercell that produced the crazy radar imagery last night in SC.
  3. Since I was confused earlier here is a tweet with the tracks
  4. Bassfield is a prelim EF4. The trailing tornado is prelim EF3. (Thanks to Andy for the correction. I got my counties all messed up)
  5. Tweet about the house that slid. Looks like it was unanchored on cinder blocks.
  6. I’m going with not at all well built. I see strait nails on the bottom right and it looks like the whole thing is on cinder blocks not anchored to the ground in any way. I don’t see a concrete pad anywhere in the higher res image. There’s a chances they only rate it EF3 depending on the evidence on the ground.
  7. The cars that were pushed into the basement may have been a factor in the collapse. Could be EF4 but NWS will definitely consider whether those cars contributed to the collapse.
  8. There is research that shows it can be estimated by VROT and CC depth. My friend does research on it and posts some stuff on twitter. He will probably be posting about this tor at some point. https://twitter.com/ou_sams
  9. McComb, MS storm is moving hard right. Looks like it will move directly toward Hattiesburg.
  10. You don’t need low level lapse rates typically, but if there’s a cap storms won’t get organized if they even initiate. In this case we need them to overcome the cap that’s evident in the 18z JAN sounding.
  11. That actually isn't a debris signature here. It is over clear air and any CC drop not correlated with a circulation and dbz<40, so that specifically isn't debris.
  12. Absolutely nuts to see this many QLCS tors ongoing.
  13. Not necessarily. The TDS doesn’t look very tall since it’s not even visible from the fort Polk radar at 7k feet. It could be EF3+ but sometimes radar signatures are deceiving.
  14. A great thread by a friend of mine talking about the OK portion of the severe threat tomorrow.
  15. This is a great twitter thread about tomorrow and dynamics in general.
  16. Mean wind isn’t on the hodograph (In that sounding) so storms should naturally turn right. The VBV doesn’t necessarily inhibit tornado genesis unless it’s below 750mb. I have noticed that on a lot of violent tornado days there is a bit (not a ton) of VBV at just above 700mb.
  17. What BMX said is very true. The QLCS comes through too early Saturday for heating to be maximized with current timing so warm sector updrafts may not be robust enough to survive. This a could result in a very impressive QLCS and I personally think (Currently) damaging winds/embedded tors are the greatest threat Saturday.
  18. One thing to keep an eye on is the mean wind being very close to or on the hodograph. That will cause storms to have trouble turning right and starting to strongly rotate.
  19. When the sounding from 0z at FWD is modified to the 65/63 of DFW, SBCAPE increases to over 1000J/Kg. Definitely want to watch these storms closely as they enter the metroplex. Storm south of Fort Worth is a total mess right now, but does have a good environment ahead of it.
×
×
  • Create New...