Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    77,547
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. Watch....there is going to be a slamming band right where the GFS has like 8" of snow.
  2. It looks like I get into the N fringe of that, just as this area did in '97.
  3. Where are you? I get less jackpot needy if I already have a great pack...I would be fine with like 16", too.
  4. I know this isn't a SWFE, but the NAM is usually pretty good at resolving mid level thermals within 48 hours.
  5. NAM has had that band locked since 12z while the GFS is ticking se and EURO is waffling. I am inclined to go NAM on that...especially since they often end up NW of where we think they will.
  6. 06z GFS had the death band about where I have it...from KASH to ORH..00Z has it from Taunton to KPYM. NAM has it a shade west of where I do...
  7. GEM shaved QPF a bit around here, but low is dead-on last run...IDK, I'm just not that spooked and call BS on the rug-pull.
  8. I've also learned that the best banding is usually NW of the best modeled QPF.
  9. I'm not seeing any of the mesos do that....and other than 00z, it was basically noise, yet it was still shaving QPF...I don't buy that because I think there will be a deformation zone west of me...makes zero sense.
  10. Why is the NBM so bonkers when nothing else is that high? GFS and EURO are such lower...
  11. Lowest was 9.5" and highest 14" yesterday...most common was 13"..but like I said, I added 4.5" of cement....though last inch or so was more fluff.
  12. Yea, because I'm sure it's greater than 10:1.....just saying it's not kuchera, though it maybe similar. my F5 site has a similar proprietary ratio formula.
  13. I like this better than the wxbell version...where do you get that?
  14. One saving grace with MRV where I am...yea, I'm prone to subsidence from low level deformation near the coast, as we all know...but I don't get shadowed here.
×
×
  • Create New...