Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    73,887

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    Takes all the fun out of it when there is nothing to alter in the quote...I felt dirty.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    If he sees that he will be...thing about Chuck is that he's lethally dispassionate.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    There is strong telconnector and multi-ensemble convergence on a heavy round of psychosis.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    Maybe a bit of chocoloate sauce dripped on the nape?
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Kind of a contnuation of that buregeoning theme from last cold season of a colder se Canada...lets keep that going into next winter.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    Mid range attenuation not of just winter threats, but of anything remotely interesting, though this one I'll take.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    Jan 7 2024 was incredible...Feb 1 2021 was okay, too....but that's about it for me.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'd rather take my chances with a cane.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    For a second I thought you were leading into optimism about next winter...then realized you were just trying to make a buck Back to the regularly scheduled warm pool lectures from Bluewave....
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    Agree!!
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think it could...
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Hopefully just your laptop
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    P Cloudy 65.8
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think it hastened it, but they also wanted out of that contract, too. I get it...I don't think he'll age particularly gracefully over 30.....
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    Nothing is proof of anything in A ball....which harkens back to the fact I would want a higher percentage yield trading a player of Dever's caliber. Not to mention they have sold us on "waiting until the youth is ready" to compete for several years, now once it arrives, they cut the teams legs out from underneath it.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    I disagree. Confident it has nothing to do with it, but we can agree to disagree. The Giants didn't opt to eat 250 million on a whim overnight, so the outcome of the series wasn't a factor- It wasn't a baseball decision.....the Sox decision to move him had nothing to do with wins and losses.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    This move had absoluely zero point zero to do with baseball...non-factor. It was about finances and (frayed) relationships.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    I don't think so. You don't move that much money overnight....this was in the works for a bit-
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    Absolutely...he's a shit-bag. I wanted him gone, but not for a bag of balls. What frustrated me is they valued saving more money over getting any talent back in return. The issue isn't Devers, but rather the continued deemphasis of the collection of premium talent.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    Complete crap.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    1) He's hitting 245 in low A ball 2) He's in low A ball and a few if not severla years away 3) Just what they needed...another OF. Yay: Prospects TLDR: Tibbs currently has the look of a good platoon outfielder. His projection could shift into more of an everyday role if his defense improves and/or he shows he can hit upper-level lefties.
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would have preferred that they ate some of the deal to got a top prospect back, or a bonafide SP.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    I think CC is going to impact the tropics in the same manner that it is winter in terms of the greater degree of variance...ie "all of nothing". When conditions are favorable, it will undoubtedly be hyper active with instense storms, but I think there will be some instances where it will result in greater shear.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    Okay, no one is calling for hyper active.
×
×
  • Create New...