Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    71,922
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. Downsloping probably plays into it....buts it not the elevation, per se....
  2. Forecast for Weekend Snows Too Aggressive Dry Air Mitigating Factor Clearly the forecast for this weekend's snows was not one of the better efforts from Eastern Mass Weather, as the 6-10" and 5-8" forecast ranges ended up verifying as 5-8" and 3-6". The short answer as to why this was the case is that the encroachment of the drier air from the south, as discussed in the Final Call, was both faster and more aggressive than expected. This acted to essentially put an end to accumulating snowfall by around dawn on Sunday, as opposed to lingering throughout much of the morning. There were some subtle warning signs amongst guidance that snowfall could be a slightly less prolific than forecast as a direct result of less proficient snow growth. Lift and Moisture Less Than Ideally placed Within Snow Growth Region Here is data derived from the NAM forecast sounding for Lawrence, MA during yesterday's storm. Note how the maximum area of lift and moisture was not colocated with the -12 to -18c snow growth region, which is the ideal thermal range within the atmosphere for moisture and lift to combine for the optimal production of snow flakes, which of course accumulate the most efficiently. While this data was considered, it was obviously not weighted heavily enough into the forecast. The reason forecasting is so difficult is because not only is it incumbent on the forecaster to complete an exhaustive review of the data, but its also crucial to determine how heavily two weight each piece of data and when to disregard. Final Grade: C+
  3. C+ https://easternmassweather.blogspot.com/2025/02/forecast-for-weekend-snows-too.html
  4. Yea, you are in the valley, too....the elevation is trivial.
  5. Looks like maybe a refresher Thursday before the next bonafide threat next weekend.
  6. March isn't going to let us out....at least the first half, won't.
  7. Never been a fan of the early spring idea.
  8. I see a pathway for me to hit 60" on the season.
  9. I globe is certainly warming, but quite frankly, I think it's silly to imply that a cold winter failing to result in a seasonal surplus of snowfall (so far) in our portion of the country is attributable to climate change. I think if anything, we have observed less evidence of CC around the country this season than in any recent one...though that is not meant to imply that CC is not occurring. My point is, so far, I have yet to see any convincing evidence that CC has began to significantly reduce our mean seasonal snowfall. Do I reserve the right to change my mind in several more years? Absolutely.
  10. What would that be? My mean snowfall since 2015 is right about at 60", and we just saw record snowfall all throughout the south. I think you need to accept reality even when it doesn't fit neatly within your agenda. Sorry. CC is real, but zealots like yourself are prone to fantastic over attribution. Fact, not opinion.
  11. Either that, or we're simply still regressing after a robust couple of decades. This becomes much more viable if we're still doing this in about 7-8 years. Here is a crazy, fantastic notion right out of a sci fi novel....perhaps exotic storms and seasons don't grow on trees?? Imagine?
  12. I'll take my chances on a net-gainer at my latitude.
  13. Well, okay then...take the -PNA and run.
  14. The very last thing I want is a gradient over the pike region while I hear the CT chorus telling me how great it looks.
  15. Right, but this isn't March 2023....I'll take my chances with a -PNA where I am, as opposed to a "perfect" pattern. I'll will take primary issues over confluence issues.
  16. Maybe for NYC, but it looks fine for this area....give me the -PNA, especially after January.
  17. The initial 700mb fronto band to the south of CT begins to weaken and translate north as it moves eastward.
×
×
  • Create New...