Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    78,134
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. See, I think this is where YOU are being too literal....replay that season 100x, and I'd be willing to bet Baltimore doesn't get consecutive 3' events. This is like saying that some NAO blocking in 2015 would have gotten Boston 120" in month instead of 100". I think that is far too reductive and Linear a thought process.
  2. I think this is where putting down the calculator and being more pragmatic has some utility.
  3. I highly doubt the warmth would have remained that related to the west had it grown that potent. I think going high on snowfall is ridiculous....that was such an anomalous outcome.
  4. If 2009 were 2.2 or 2.3 instead of 1.6, I think that would have had a significant impact...yes.
  5. I'd take 82-83 or 23-24 over 2009-2010 any day. I get what you are saying, though...it was flukey that it was that bad here...blocking was so extreme.
  6. Well, it sucked as it was where I am...so not a big leap. Do I think DC would have still had 75" or whatever? No, I don't.
  7. Oh in that case, I'd love to relive it and spike my nerf football.
  8. No, not far, but not ideal....and couldn't catch a break.
  9. Goes hand-in-hand...weaker overall would have likely diminished the degree of warmth that leaked east.
  10. Yes, it had some favorable traits.....it was basin-wide, not east based, but if it were a bit weaker we may have been able to prevent that warmth in the east that ultimately sank our battle ship. There was probably some bad luck there, too....so I see what you are saying about being too literal. I probably oversimplified it due to the perfunctory nature of the dialogue to prove a point. I'm more nuanced in the actual analysis.
  11. Yes. I will grant you that 1991 could have ended up a but better than it did, but there was definitely still a god bit of warmth to the east that raised the probability of the shit outcome that we had.
  12. Right....events that strong always have warmth in region 1.2. Okay.....I get that. But that doesn't make me wrong....good luck getting one that doesn't.
  13. Exceptionally strong....I don't argue 1.5-2.0 can be favorable.
  14. Maybe I'm wrong...but until I see data to the contrary, I will feel as though extremely strong ENSO is hostile for high latitude blocking.
  15. Right....on average.....exceptionally strong events aren't average.
  16. No, I'm not "stuck"....what I do know is there is literal dearth of high latitude blocking when ENSO is exceptionally powerful, and I don't think that's a coincidence. Okay, the sample size is small....but it still is what it is.
  17. I would prefer it a bit weaker...but I don't doubt we could have had a good interlude(s) if the polar domain were not so hostile. I compare all of these analogs with a fine-tooth comb this summer and fall.
  18. Orientation doesn't matter much for weak events, either.....much more disparity in weak events....ie east-based events that were colder, and west-based that were warmer.
  19. Not counting one KU in the mid Atlantic....I mean above average snowfall throughout the NE and colder than average.
  20. I think it's a combination of the fact that there is so much excess heat in extreme warm ENSO, and it impacts the Atlantic STJ in such a manner that is very hostile to high latitude blocking. I'd have to look back at the research to double check..been a minute.
  21. I knew you would call sample size Well, once we get a big NE winter with a 2.1+ El Niño, I'll capitulate.
×
×
  • Create New...