Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    75,833
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. I won't melt about that again until Saturday...promised last night.
  2. Perhaps the famous musician pays $20 to have his elderly folks plowed?
  3. Sorry.....I'm trying to do notes at the same time and missed the start of the exchange. My bad.
  4. I get that...I'm not arguing the semantics of it, all I am saying is that amplification of the MJO in phase 6-7 de-constructively interferes with east coast suppression, which is also true.
  5. Maritime Continent. Lag of 7-10 days from when the storm hits is phase 6, so I don't see how that supports your position that the N trend is unrelated. It was amplified in phase 6 minus 7-10 days from storm impact.
  6. Constructive/deconstructive interference is an impact.
  7. If there is lag that implies more of an impact bc it's moving out of the MC.
  8. It's going to have to fly..it was in phase 6 3 days ago.
  9. MJO has actually really amped up of late. https://www.bom.gov.au/clim_data/IDCKGEM000/rmm.74toRealtime.txt
  10. It's like the pre Xmas 2024 event, but stronger storm and better airmass.
  11. I added this after: . (Phase 8) it's become a unicorn since the west Pacific warmed. This is why.
  12. It's not impossible....phases are usually flawed and complicated...odds are that it will be imperfect, but probably not in that precise manner given the lead time left. That doesn't have to mean we get a blizzard, though.
  13. I should have checked the MJO before whining about confluence....def my bad on that. I don't look deeply until I blog.
  14. I'm always leery of predicating any forecast on phase 8 until at minuscule lead time....it's become a unicorn since the west Pacific warmed.
  15. Yes, this is what I have been saying, which is why it's important to get ample mid level dynamics on the interior CP.
  16. I think it's more IP/dry slot risk, at least off of the cape...but we aren't quite there yet.
×
×
  • Create New...