Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    72,327

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'm not sold yet. The later occlusion, I trust...the se tick is more tenous.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    Congrats
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    Check back at 00z ; )
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    No worries
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    MBY, but you guys are close enough to benefit.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    That was GEM...here is UK
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    What do you need? Just ask me...its not my focus, but I will if you ask...
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    All he had to do was ask...
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    UK MUCH better
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    GEM
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    GEM not only ticked se, but also delayed maturation a bit.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    JESUS...9" at the pike up to 30" in Lunenburg....holy gradient on the GEM
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Tongue deeply in cheek...
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    NAM is leading the way!!!
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    UK, NAM, RGEM and GEM. Only one not to is GFS.
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    NAM, RGEM and GEM have all trended south.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    Dec 1992 is #1..
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    RGEM NAMed us....wow
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    Looks a little slower on the GFS
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    Nice call. Yup. Its too high...no way ORH is getting 17" via WAA.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    RGEM followed the NAM on the south trend, just not the stupid amounts.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    Sure isn't Dracut? lol
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    Hopefully in didn't tell us to go tuck ourselves on round II
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    NAM was a perfect track for me, but eastern areas would like it to mature a hair more slowly on that track.
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    Its the NAM, and it probably won't happen, but that is not a drastic change....within reason that it could be a trend. Probably not, but...... Yea
×
×
  • Create New...