Its too bad we've had such a wet winter with normal temps, yet so little snow at this latitude...the return rate on that must be pretty low. I've actually been a bit too WARM with temps, yet bust, boom, bang on snowfall...tricky science.
Yea, I blew it. I was confident, so gotta admit when you're wrong. Rrgardless of how much luck is involved...bottom line is I was wong. However that doesn't mean we still can't score.
I commend you for analyzing OP solutions of storm threats 9 days out, after being force-fed a steady diet of rectal sauce for three months running. I won't even look unless something viable is inside of a week.
I'm still not convinced of that, but at this point, I've pulled back and am no longer invested like I was. I'm so sick of this season in general. I don't even feel like blogging any more at this point....feel like its been about 50 pages of hot air so far.
If the Pats lose, I'll probably go nuclear.
The idea that we could just keep getting porked.
I know you were being tongue in cheek...just saying.
Oh, yea...hell, I punted the first 10 days of february as far as big sne snow goes....days ago.
Diane and John...I'm not dismissing that. I can see how it continues in the absence of much NAO or PNA...that doesn't scream big snow pattern to me. But its not "close shades", either.
I still think this could go the way of Feb 1969 sensible weather wise..perhaps just colder. We have less NAO than 1969, but better EPO....similar RNA.
Maybe colder with a bit less snow than 1969...
Diff from 2015 is that we don't have the PNA ridge, which was also perfectly placed....however it looks like we may have a bit more NAO.
Botton line: Expect snowier outcomes, but not 100" in 30 days.