Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    72,325

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 40/70 Benchmark

  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'd swallow a chainsaw.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    SWFE is essentially a Miller B that transfers too late.
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yes...SWFE and Miller B city...dependent upon degree of polar resistance and trough placement.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    This is the exact type of set up I feel will be most prevalent throughout December....crappy Pacific, decent Atlantic....pedestrian cold.
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    I buy it, though I would not be surprised to see it rushed a bit and the NAO at least begin more east-based.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Right....Iota is in the Caribbean. Limiting factor will be central america...again.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    Plenty of yard work in Methuen....gotta start the leaves this wknd.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would be happy with either of those.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
    The ACE should take a another jump with IOTA, which may get pretty strong.
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yes, but the issue was those who were staying home after they had the option to going back.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    I would also disagree with the notion that we are a country of people who would engage in such behavior, which is why I specified that those people are in the minority, but there were some.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    That was expected. I said in the outlook that the western flank shouldn't cool too much more..
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, he is going 2010-2011...which is I parenthetically added "most of us" lol LC and DT are going pretty big, too, but backloaded.....although DT is waivering a bit due to lack of cold up north.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    ?
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Operative word being "low"....I mean its clear that 1996, 2011 (to most of us) or 2015 isn't en route.
  16. 40/70 Benchmark
    I am reminded of why I haven't ventured into OT in about 10 years...even for sports.
  17. 40/70 Benchmark
    Obviously, but that isn't the point. It should not be that way, but it is. And it exacerbates the issue due to the resultant reluctance to get back to work. Its a travesty that the inequality of the income distribution is so severe, but it is.
  18. 40/70 Benchmark
    That isn't the case with the majority...obviously, the vast majority of people made less staying home.
  19. 40/70 Benchmark
    Cool. I never entered that thread...maybe once or twice of like literally 10 seconds.
  20. 40/70 Benchmark
    I'll give it a rest. I have never engaged in this before, as I usually do not venture into banter threads. Sorry if I was beating a dead covid cell.
  21. 40/70 Benchmark
    Right. Its just not worth it to go back to work, so they protract the befits as long as possible, which fosters dependency.
  22. 40/70 Benchmark
    For once, your killer Hadley Cell may work in our favor lol
  23. 40/70 Benchmark
    Even during the first shutdown....there were people making more than they did when they worked. That is a fact and a problematic one at that.
  24. 40/70 Benchmark
    February 2017 may have been decent....but yea. #makefebruarygreatagain
  25. 40/70 Benchmark
    I agree 100%. I realize that I will get bashed for this, but if it comes down to needing to destroy the economy in order to save the most vulnerable, then I think I would rather see a survival of the fittest and most mindful element come into play.
×
×
  • Create New...