I understood that, but what I was confused about was why there was a level of uncertainty implied as to where subsidence would set up should said scenario materialize. I was breaking his balls over it, but its seemed pretty clear for at least a couple of days.
Maybe he meant uncertainty with respect to the fact that subsidence could be elsewhere, IF the the forcing doesn't chase the convection. I've been saying all along that the coast would have heavy precip owed to low level fronto w coastal front, and mid level goodies west...subby in my area.