Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    79,146

  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

About 40/70 Benchmark

  • Birthday 11/16/1980

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KLWM
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Methuen, MA, 154' ASL 30 mi N of Boston
  • Interests
    Snow, Canes , Baseball, Football and Keeping Fit.

Recent Profile Visitors

116,009 profile views
  1. 40/70 Benchmark
    You can see that NF cold pool go bye-bye, as I was expecting earlier this summer.
  2. 40/70 Benchmark
    30 Day change:
  3. 40/70 Benchmark
    August should be out early next week.
  4. 40/70 Benchmark
    August isn't quite out yet...May-July: https://psl.noaa.gov/data/atmoswrit/map/index.html
  5. 40/70 Benchmark
    Well, like you said....we need to give it through October.
  6. 40/70 Benchmark
    Should be in the seasonal mean, but we need to time one during the negative intervals...there should be some.
  7. 40/70 Benchmark
    BTW, if you have seen the EURO and CANSIPS snowfall output, this appears to be what these models do.
  8. 40/70 Benchmark
    Sure, but the question you need to ask yourself..."is it already out of the picture completely"...because if the answer is no, then it will show up this season.
  9. 40/70 Benchmark
  10. 40/70 Benchmark
    Agree. I wonder if a neutralish PDO with an El Niño of this magnitude doesn't shift the STJ inward and upward relative to climo for intense El Niño.
  11. 40/70 Benchmark
    Yea, someone in the New England forum was trying to tell me were going to have a -PNA this winter...I was like, find a super El Niño that pulled that off. -AO/+PNA means you can essentially eliminate the bottom dwelling seasons....even 1972 didn't. Now, maybe it will be bootleg, etc...but the season will average +PNA in the DJFM mean.
  12. 40/70 Benchmark
    What I can tell you based on what has been happening for the past decade is that the error is likely to be guidance underestimating the scope and magnitude of that Canadian ridge, so it's probably safe to assume that the greater heights will extend further to the south and east than most guidance suggests.....which combined with the poor read on the Pacific makes me very suspicious of that trend to shove the lower heights northward on the CANSIPS. This isn't me saying awful winter....I don't think, or want that to be the case, but that doesn't mean that I'm going to don my Frosty the Snowman boxers every time that I post.
  13. 40/70 Benchmark
    I don't know Wall, so I'll take your word for it. I think most on this board would agree that my only agenda is getting the forecast correct, and placing much stock into a model with such a poor initialization of the Pacific basin, both ENSO and extra tropical, gives me significant pause before seriously considering it's output. This isn't about CC, or how well the model did last year....it's about the fact that it has such an obviously poor read on the Pacific.
  14. 40/70 Benchmark
    So it's going to be too low with heights in the southeast, but nail the northeast and mid atlantic? Good luck-
  15. 40/70 Benchmark
    Music to my eyes, ears and weenie.
×
×
  • Create New...