Jump to content

BlizzardWx

Meteorologist
  • Posts

    364
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About BlizzardWx

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KTUL
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Tulsa Oklahoma

Recent Profile Visitors

2,432 profile views
  1. The issue still remains why that occurred, but this does make sense otherwise.
  2. I remember last year the mid level PV was often partly to mostly uncoupled from the lower level PV, or maybe it was just much weaker than the mid level vortex. Am I remembering that right? I wonder if there are any hints of that happening again.
  3. FWIW this is exactly what I was talking about in my last post. People need to stop reading into what happened at exactly their house (mesoscale randomness) and assume it means anything in the big picture. That level of precision is noise and does not mean a pattern was good or bad.
  4. I'm not sure exactly how you would do it, but I know I'd like to see more winter outlooks or past winter discussion focusing on snowfall potential rather than what fell at specific points when possible. Maybe another way to look at it would be to say is this objectively a snow producing pattern even if it didn't occur at Central Park (or wherever). If we could remove luck (mesoscale patterns) from more of our analysis I imagine it would be more constructive to discussion of the patterns at hand. I think some of what @donsutherland1 has been showing is kind of a step in that direction. You could in theory score a pattern based on its historical correlation to snowy patterns to say how good a winter should have been regardless of what actually happened at some point. Just a thought.
  5. I do think the pattern coming up will favor slowly moving that warm pool in the central Pacific a bit further east with continued cooling influences east of Japan and along the west coast, at least for the next 2 weeks anyway.
  6. I appreciate your views and everybody else's. I come here to see viewpoints from all angles. I'd say the same thing to you as well as everybody else, please continue to contribute. I value it.
  7. Hopefully time to finally kill the -PDO and MJO 4-6 warm pool with that flip.
  8. True. I do think ridging ends up a bit less amplified than last year, but I still think we see cold get a bit further south than what it has.
  9. EPS weeklies try to bring the GOA trough back by the 20th of this month. But on the other hand they didn't see this GOA ridge until a few days ago. But considering this GOA ridge will probably be a dominant feature this winter I am not surprised to see it poking back up.
  10. That was when one of the worst ice storms for northeast OK occurred. Please no
  11. Definitely unusual as you noted, but does it matter if the forcing is propagating the "wrong" direction? Off hand I am not sure why it necessarily matters directly, but indirectly it implies a weakness in potential analog forecasts.
  12. The more I hear about this SAI index, the more questionable it sounds. But as for the northeast Pacific, I agree it will probably continue to cool given the storm track. It could always reverse later of course, but I see no sign of that through October at least.
  13. Yes, and he says that. But I suppose if September is well above normal it could in theory help October. I don't know, just passing it along basically.
  14. I'm not real big on the Siberian snow cover thing. But Judah Cohen posted this on X saying we are off to a good start and on track to continue.
  15. As most of you probably know, the PDO is the first EOF and explains the greatest amount of variability in the northern Pacific. But there are other modes that matter. I was looking at a paper from Werb and Rudnick in 2023. They showed how historically the PDO accounted for 23% of variance with the 2nd EOF at 13%. But noted how that second EOF in the past decades increased to 18%. It might even be more than that now. But the point I wanted to make is that this 2nd EOF looks a lot like the pattern we have had lately, particularly with the stronger anomalies off of Japan. Obviously a bit mixed given waters are also warm off the west coast. I'd say we have a -EOF 1 (-PDO) combining with a +EOF 2 right now. Has any work looked at the winter effects of this second EOF? It's not the exact same thing as the NPM. We really ought to be paying more attention to it. In a broader sense, the lack of contrast across the Pacific will affect how the -PDO manifests itself compared to the last few winters. It's probably the most widespread warm blob we have seen.
×
×
  • Create New...