Jump to content

40/70 Benchmark

Members
  • Posts

    76,649
  • Joined

  • Last visited

6 Followers

About 40/70 Benchmark

  • Birthday 11/16/1980

Profile Information

  • Four Letter Airport Code For Weather Obs (Such as KDCA)
    KLWM
  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Methuen, MA, 154' ASL 30 mi N of Boston
  • Interests
    Snow, Canes , Baseball, Football and Keeping Fit.

Recent Profile Visitors

96,378 profile views
  1. That is def. a naked-twister run for me....CF stopping by for lunch next Monday.
  2. Just looked ....there is that run from a few days ago I said we'd chase all week
  3. Saturday Snowfall Forecast Verification Enhanced Areas Identified But Snowfall Under Forecast Reality Versus Eastern Mass Weather Forecast Map In order for a snowfall forecast to be truly elite, it is necessary to not only be highly accurate on a qualitative level (identify areas of heavier and lighter snowfall), but obviously it also needs to provide an accurate quantitative assessment of precisely how much snow will fall. When comparing the forecast to reality yesterday, it is apparent that the forecast was very accurate in the diagnosing which areas would be heavily impacted, while leaving much to be desired in that it greatly underestimated the snowfall in said areas. Dual Areas of Focus For Enhanced Snowfall The forecast on Friday identified one area of heavier snowfall associated with an inverted trough over central areas of the forecast area, and another zone of ocean-enhanced snowfall along the north and south shores of the Boston area. The placement of these areas nearly perfect, however, amounts were more on the order of 8-12"+ as opposed to the 3-6"+ that was denoted. Granted this was a very difficult forecast, that is a rather large discrepancy that had major implications for those impacted. Final Grade: B-
  4. Tough forecast yesterday, nailed the areas of enhanced snowfall, but the 3-6"+ forecast was definitely an inadequate range. I tried to convey the uncertainty by adding the "plus" sign, but that discrepancy undoubtedly left something to be desired. It was more like 8-12"+. I also should have had both areas of enhancement extend a bit further to the west. Grade that one on a curve a bit and say B-
  5. With PNA sliding negative it will definitely be Miller B.
  6. Not nearly the same concern it would have warranted a month or two ago....."I ain't afraid of no ocean"
  7. It's funny watching DT perplexed at how the guidance keeps whiffing on the MJO getting into phase 8 with any purpose...he keeps buying it every time. You think one of these seasons he would wrap his mind around the fact that there isn't some metaphorical switch that is hit when the weekly anomaly in ENSO region 3.4 gets above -0.5C...he always spews that same nonsense about La Niña dying, blah, blah, blah. I mean...you do this for a living, and I advertised the fact that guidance would do this, and why last fall.
  8. He's struggles to accept CC....I've tried to explain that acceptance is the easiest path.
  9. Nooooo ....depth was about 13.5" last night. 6.5" from this.
×
×
  • Create New...