Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,608
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December Med/Long Range Disco


WinterWxLuvr

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

How is it not good?  Looks fine to me.  HM seems to be thinking a SSW is increasing likely as we move through January, similar to Cohen's thoughts. 

I would think a SSW in the later half of January would be ideal for us if it were to occur. It could set the stage for a very solid 2-3 week period in February when snowfall climo is at it's peak. Could also open the door for some extreme cold. Maybe shades of Feb. 2007 with more snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never knew that.... I thought it was important no matter what. What's the reason?

It's never a bad thing at whatever time but from what I understand and heard a -NAO earlier in the season may benefit regions to our south. I think an early season -NAO may also allow a northwest flow to dominate leaving us very cold but dry. As we head later in the season as wavelengths begin to change chances for phasing improves. I'm sure others can provide a better answer but I've heard on many occasions form various mets that a -NAO serves us best in February and March more so than December and early January. My guess is that storms that occur in the first half of winter when we have a -NAO probably deliver better when the NAO is moving back toward positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's tongue-in-cheek to be throwing around HECS in like every other post in here, but maybe there's an underlying sense of expectation there... if so, that's really a setup for disappointment. The only season DC had a top-10 event where we didn't go over 30" seasonal total was 82/83, and that was still a well-above average seasonal snow total.  

 

Why would this season be favored to see a HECS? It was never meant to be as ideal as 09/10. If the forecast is for a somewhat above average snowfall total, we know we get there in much more modest ways. We could get to an above average season with a single 8-12" (far from a HECS) event along with a couple of other smaller events. Or, we could go the 77/78 or 79/80 route and have two or three 4-7" events contribute to most of the seasonal total. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's never a bad thing at whatever time but from what I understand and heard a -NAO earlier in the season may benefit regions to our south. I think an early season -NAO may also allow a northwest flow to dominate leaving us very cold but dry. As we head later in the season as wavelengths begin to change chances for phasing improves. I'm sure others can provide a better answer but I've heard on many occasions form various mets that a -NAO serves us best in February and March more so than December and early January. My guess is that storms that occur in the first half of winter when we have a -NAO probably deliver better when the NAO is moving back toward positive.

 

Thanks... that makes a lot of sense. That might explain why a month like January 2003 was so cold and dry while the south kept getting blasted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's tongue-in-cheek to be throwing around HECS in like every other post in here, but maybe there's an underlying sense of expectation there... if so, that's really a setup for disappointment. The only season DC had a top-10 event where we didn't go over 30" seasonal total was 82/83, and that was still a well-above average snowfall.  

 

Why would this season be favored to see a HECS? It was never meant to be as ideal as 09/10. If the forecast is for a somewhat above average snowfall total, we know we get there in much more modest ways. We could get to an above average season with a single 8-12" (far from a HECS) event along with a couple of other smaller events. Or, we could go the 77/78 or 79/80 route and have two or three 4-7" events contribute to most of the seasonal total. 

 

I think an El Nino with good blocking potential will always have a better than average chance of a HECS (of course, it would still be very improbable otherwise it wouldn't be called historic).

 

But my happiness doesn't depend on a HECS... I enjoy both big and small events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know it's tongue-in-cheek to be throwing around HECS in like every other post in here, but maybe there's an underlying sense of expectation there... if so, that's really a setup for disappointment. The only season DC had a top-10 event where we didn't go over 30" seasonal total was 82/83, and that was still a well-above average snowfall.  

 

Why would this season be favored to see a HECS? It was never meant to be as ideal as 09/10. If the forecast is for a somewhat above average snowfall total, we know we get there in much more modest ways. We could get to an above average season with a single 8-12" (far from a HECS) event along with a couple of other smaller events. Or, we could go the 77/78 or 79/80 route and have two or three 4-7" events contribute to most of the seasonal total. 

I think a lot of us have had unrealistic expectations due the frequent occurrences of KU events starting around the turn of the century. Granted several of these events had little impact on this region but on the other hand many did. I recently did a post about how lucky most have been in terms of MECS and HECS since March 1993 but I don't remember which thread it was, may have been earlier in this one.

 

There are some interesting tidbits concerning KU's. Of the 54 storms listed the earliest was in 1956. From that first one in 1956 until 1992 there were 23 storms listed. From 1993 to current there are 31 listed, but out of those 31 storms, 26 of them took place from 2000 to current. In other words there have been 26 KU events since 2000. Bottom line is there has been almost as many KU events in the last 14 years as there was in the prior 44 year period. So we are clearly in the middle of some type of cycle producing large storms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think an El Nino with good blocking potential will always have a better than average chance of a HECS (of course, it would still be very improbable otherwise it wouldn't be called historic).

 

But my happiness doesn't depend on a HECS... I enjoy both big and small events.

Yup, that's my point. Very good patterns yield the vast majority of our widespread 8"+ storms. Very good patterns can happen in a 2-week stretch in the middle of an otherwise lousy winter.

 

It takes an ideal pattern to get our locally historic storms, and those ideal patterns usually happen during legendary winters. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of us have had unrealistic expectations due the frequent occurrences of KU events starting around the turn of the century. Granted several of these events had little impact on this region but on the other hand many did. I recently did a post about how lucky most have been in terms of MECS and HECS since March 1993 but I don't remember which thread it was, may have been earlier in this one.

 

There are some interesting tidbits concerning KU's. Of the 54 storms listed the earliest was in 1956. From that first one in 1956 until 1992 there were 23 storms listed. From 1993 to current there are 31 listed, but out of those 31 storms, 26 of them took place from 2000 to current. In other words there have been 26 KU events since 2000. Bottom line is there has been almost as many KU events in the last 14 years as there was in the prior 44 year period. So we are clearly in the middle of some type of cycle producing large storms.

KUs are more likely now than they used to be.

 

Unless they're tornadoes after 2011.

 

Or hurricanes after 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

KUs are more likely now than they used to be.

 

Unless they're tornadoes after 2011.

 

Or hurricanes after 2005.

 

brutal post :(

 

though I'd be ok with the KU streak ending if it means the feast/famine cycle also ends. I think we'd handle it fairly well.... not sure about NYC weenies who are used to getting 40"+ every other year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a lot of us have had unrealistic expectations due the frequent occurrences of KU events starting around the turn of the century. Granted several of these events had little impact on this region but on the other hand many did. I recently did a post about how lucky most have been in terms of MECS and HECS since March 1993 but I don't remember which thread it was, may have been earlier in this one.

 

There are some interesting tidbits concerning KU's. Of the 54 storms listed the earliest was in 1956. From that first one in 1956 until 1992 there were 23 storms listed. From 1993 to current there are 31 listed, but out of those 31 storms, 26 of them took place from 2000 to current. In other words there have been 26 KU events since 2000. Bottom line is there has been almost as many KU events in the last 14 years as there was in the prior 44 year period. So we are clearly in the middle of some type of cycle producing large storms.

 

On the flip side, at the same time we've had this amazing streak of KU storms, central PA has been in a pretty rough snow drought, almost to the point of NYC being a better place for snow than UNV, which is kind of ridiculous. Psuhoffman has talked about it in several posts and said that the snow drought up there even hurts northern Maryland to some extent, so while this KU streak can't last forever, IMO, neither can central PA's snow drought. Sooner or later, the natural order of things will return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the flip side, at the same time we've had this amazing streak of KU storms, central PA has been in a pretty rough snow drought, almost to the point of NYC being a better place for snow than UNV, which is kind of ridiculous. Psuhoffman has talked about it in several posts and said that the snow drought up there even hurts northern Maryland to some extent, so while this KU streak can't last forever, IMO, neither can central PA's snow drought. Sooner or later, the natural order of things will return.

Last 15 years at unv: 19.8,32.1,21.7,83.6,71.4,36.2,26.9,37.6,43.2,26.3,49.1,38.4,19,43.6 and 51.8 with an average of 40 which is 6" under their 30 yr avg and still 8" per more than Central Park has averaged over the same 15 years. This central pa snow drought isn't nearly as great as you guys would like to think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...