WestCoaster Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 We've seen some model agreement with the Canadian now: Nov. 23 12Z run: Nov. 24 00Z run: Nov. 24 12Z run: GEM has 6-8" for YYZ and a whopping 10-12" for CLE and roughly 6" for CMH GFS and NAM only showing about 2-3" for these locations. Euro seems to have a warmer solution all around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 24, 2013 Author Share Posted November 24, 2013 000FXUS61 KBUF 241533AFDBUFAREA FORECAST DISCUSSIONNATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BUFFALO NY1033 AM EST SUN NOV 24 2013 ... THE WEATHER COULD GET MORE INTERESTING TUESDAY NIGHT. THREE OF THEOPERATIONAL MODELS AND THE LATEST SREF GUIDANCE ALL SHOW A MOREWESTWARD TRACK TO THE SURFACE LOW THAT WILL BE LIFTING NORTH FROMTHE GULF COAST STATES. THE GFS IS STILL THE ODD MODEL OUT IN THAT ITTRACKS THE CENTER OF THE LOW FARTHER TO THE EAST. WITH MODELCONSENSUS NOW SHOWING A MORE WESTWARD TRACK...WILL SHOW AT LEASTLIKELY POPS FOR MEASURABLE PCPN TUESDAY NIGHT. THE LATESTTEMPERATURE PROFILES SUGGEST THAT SNOW WILL BE THE PREDOMINANT PCPNTYPE...BUT IF THE WARMER ECMWF SOLUTION VERIFIES...THERE WILL BE ABETTER CHANCE FOR A MIX OF PCPN...ESPECIALLY EAST OF LAKE ONTARIO.WE WILL KEEP A CLOSE EYE ON THIS SITUATION SINCE THE THANKSGIVINGTRAVEL TIMEFRAME MAY BE SUBSTANTIALLY IMPACTED. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Latest UKMET, stays solid on its track. If it were exploited a few more hours I'd suspect around 3-6" for the GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 24, 2013 Author Share Posted November 24, 2013 Definitely a few inches less juicy than the 00Z run but still good. Of course it's the Canadian that is favouring us Canadians The fact that it doesn't appear to be followed by an immediate snow-melting torch is even more exciting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Euro trended slightly further East, GTA gets about 1-3" on this run. Lets see what the ECMWF Ensembles say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Quite a bit of waffling going on now from run to run. NAM has shifted considerably east from its previous run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Quite a bit of waffling going on now from run to run. NAM has shifted considerably east from its previous run. Yes still no consistency despite this being less than 72 hours out, its incredible. I suspect by tomorrows 12z runs will start getting a more fixed track being pronounced on the models along with the precip field. The 12z Euro Ensembles were slightly west of the OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrisale Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 YYZ thread. I'm so in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilbertfly Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 some sampling on the way to help the models.... WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTSCARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.0125 PM EST SUN 24 NOVEMBER 2013SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD) VALID 25/1100Z TO 26/1100Z NOVEMBER 2013 TCPOD NUMBER.....13-176 I. ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS 1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS. 2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: NEGATIVE. II. PACIFIC REQUIREMENTS 1. NEGATIVE RECONNAISSANCE REQUIREMENTS. 2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: NEGATIVE. NOTE: ATLANTIC WINTER STORM REQUIREMENTS 1. FLIGHT ONE --TEAL 71-- A. A66/ DROP 9 (28.2N 93.8W)/ 26/0000Z B. AFXXX 01WSA TRACK66 C. 25/2000Z D. 10 DROPS ON TRACK AS PUBLISHED E. AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE/ 26/0200Z 2. FLIGHT TWO --TEAL 72-- A. A66/ DROP 9 (28.2N 93.8W)/ 26/1200Z B. AFXXX 02WSA TRACK66 C. 26/0800Z D. 10 DROPS ON TRACK AS PUBLISHED E. AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE/ 26/1400Z 3. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: POSSIBLE A66/ DROP 9 (28.2N 93.8W)/ 27/0000Z. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrisale Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Even the GEM has marginal surface temperatures for snow, so whatever we may get will likely be quite wet. UKMET and the NAM showing just below zero on temps as well. Probably not enough precip for significant evap cooling either, as of now most models have us on the fringe of this system. GFS stays a bit too far east for more than a dusting but is a little colder with temps. Need the phase to happen earlier. Doubting any solutions over 3" for YYZ at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Even the GEM has marginal surface temperatures for snow, so whatever we may get will likely be quite wet. UKMET and the NAM showing just below zero on temps as well. Probably not enough precip for significant evap cooling either, as of now most models have us on the fringe of this system. GFS stays a bit too far east for more than a dusting but is a little colder with temps. Need the phase to happen earlier. Doubting any solutions over 3" for YYZ at the moment. Latest GFS shows about 5-8cm for Toronto/GTA. Latest RGEM through 48 hours looks very juicy. 0z Nam was slightly East of the area but it shifted slightly west of the 18z solution. It all depends how the models phase both the waves. Some models are too progressive with the streams and therefore the phases occurs a bit later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 25, 2013 Author Share Posted November 25, 2013 I have a feeling this really should be getting more attention than it is by EC. Not even a weather statement.NWS has just issued a winter storm watch for the region as a result of this:URGENT - WINTER WEATHER MESSAGENATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE BUFFALO NY1016 PM EST SUN NOV 24 2013NYZ001-002-010>014-085-251130-/O.NEW.KBUF.WS.A.0003.131127T0000Z-131128T0000Z/NIAGARA-ORLEANS-NORTHERN ERIE-GENESEE-WYOMING-LIVINGSTON-ONTARIO-SOUTHERN ERIE-INCLUDING THE CITIES OF...NIAGARA FALLS...MEDINA...BUFFALO...BATAVIA...WARSAW...GENESEO...CANANDAIGUA...ORCHARD PARK...SPRINGVILLE1016 PM EST SUN NOV 24 2013...WINTER STORM WATCH IN EFFECT FROM TUESDAY EVENING THROUGHWEDNESDAY EVENING...THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN BUFFALO HAS ISSUED A WINTER STORMWATCH...WHICH IS IN EFFECT FROM TUESDAY EVENING THROUGH WEDNESDAYEVENING.* LOCATIONS...NIAGARA FRONTIER...THE GENESEE VALLEY AND NORTHERNFINGER LAKES REGIONS.* TIMING...EARLY TUESDAY EVENING THROUGH EARLY WEDNESDAY EVENING.* HAZARDS...MODERATE TO HEAVY SNOW.* ACCUMULATIONS....POTENTIAL FOR 7 INCHES OR MORE OF SNOW.* VISIBILITIES...AS LOW AS A HALF MILE AT TIMES.* IMPACTS...TRAVEL MAY BE DIFFICULT AT TIMES WITH SNOW COVEREDROADS AND REDUCED VISIBILITY DUE TO SNOW. SNOW COULD ALSODISRUPT EARLY HOLIDAY TRAVEL TUESDAY EVENING THROUGH WEDNESDAY.* FORECASTER CONFIDENCE...LOW TO MEDIUM.PRECAUTIONARY/PREPAREDNESS ACTIONS...A WINTER STORM WATCH MEANS THAT HEAVY SNOW AND/OR ICEACCUMULATIONS ARE POSSIBLE. IF YOU ARE WITHIN THE WATCH AREA...REMAIN ALERT TO RAPIDLY CHANGING WEATHER CONDITIONS.STAY TUNED TO NOAA WEATHER RADIO OR YOUR FAVORITE SOURCE OFWEATHER INFORMATION FOR THE LATEST UPDATES. ADDITIONAL DETAILSCAN ALSO BE FOUND AT WWW.WEATHER.GOV/BUFFALO.&&$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 0z GFS snowfall accum's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 http://collaboration.cmc.ec.gc.ca/cmc/cmdn/pcpn_type/pcpn_type_gem_reg.html Latest 0Z CMC shows a good dumping of snowfall for the GTA, around 10-15cm. Ottawa gets hammered but Montreal switches over to -ZR and rain. Ohio and areas around Buffalo/Niagara region get hit hard too. Edit: Make sure the Date is on the 25th, 0z* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 25, 2013 Author Share Posted November 25, 2013 00Z GEM looks decent Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 GEM snowfall Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Phasing starts too late with this one. Basically the GFS/GEM are as far west as you're going to get. And even if they verify, you run into thermal issues outside the higher elevations. I'm definitely not rooting against my old stomping grounds, but this has DAB written all over it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Latest 0Z UKMET, in line with the GGEM and GFS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Phasing starts too late with this one. Basically the GFS/GEM are as far west as you're going to get. And even if they verify, you run into thermal issues outside the higher elevations. I'm definitely not rooting against my old stomping grounds, but this has DAB written all over it. Excellent analysis. If the phasing occurred around Texas this storm would have tracked up the App mountains and would have retained a better precip field on the north side. If this had occurred, would have been a major storm for most of this subforum. I suspect around 3-6cm at for the GTA, maybe 8cm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 CLE has pulled out a watch for the far eastern Ohio Counties. I like the definite shift west overnight, but there's not much wiggle room for this. Here's their current thinking: Gotta love some of those fantasy SREF plume totals for Cleveland: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeye Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 For this area (CMH), for this particular storm 1-3" looks good and also looks like the best we could ask for. Not much snow on the western flanks until you get further northeast. Any stronger would mean more precip but more mixing too. I'll take it, we haven't had a white thanksgiving in a very very long time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JayPSU Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Hmmmm, would 1-3" justify using my brand new snowblower for he first time? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 25, 2013 Author Share Posted November 25, 2013 Hmmmm, would 1-3" justify using my brand new snowblower for he first time? HAHA! Hmmm........ I say YES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Starting to see some consistency on the models. Euro ensembles showed a bit more qpf than the operational and its line with what the UKMET, CMC and NAM are depicting. GFS is is slighty further east than the other models. The timing of the phase is crucial with this storm. As for the GTA, most models show an average of 7-15cm or 3-6". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trent Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Wow. NAM is juiced up with at least 0.5" for the entire eastern half of Ohio with 0.75" for the eastern third. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrisale Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 EURO output text is encouraging, wish temps were a bit lower but we are lucky this will scoot by at in the evening/overnight hours. ECMWF Deterministic FORECAST FOR: YYZ LAT= 43.67 LON= -79.63 ELE= 568 00Z NOV25 2 M 850 SFC SFC 700 6 HR 500 1000 TMP TMP PRS RHU RHU QPF HGT 500 TUE 12Z 26-NOV -1.9 -8.1 1021 69 15 0.00 549 532 TUE 18Z 26-NOV 1.5 -7.8 1019 68 22 0.00 549 534 WED 00Z 27-NOV -0.1 -6.7 1015 88 98 0.03 547 535 WED 06Z 27-NOV -1.1 -5.8 1010 95 99 0.21 545 537 WED 12Z 27-NOV -0.9 -6.9 1004 91 96 0.16 540 536 WED 18Z 27-NOV 1.3 -7.8 1001 72 47 0.02 533 532 THU 00Z 28-NOV -3.4 -10.5 1004 75 54 0.01 527 524 THU 06Z 28-NOV -5.9 -13.2 1010 73 76 0.00 524 516 THU 12Z 28-NOV -7.5 -15.4 1017 72 3 0.00 530 516 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCoaster Posted November 25, 2013 Author Share Posted November 25, 2013 With that QPF I would only expect about 5-8cm but I'll take it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 With that QPF I would only expect about 5-8cm but I'll take it Using 10:1 snow ratios it would equate to 8-12cm actually, give or take. The amounts maybe slightly more closer to the lake where you reside as oppose to northern regions of the GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harrisale Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 With that QPF I would only expect about 5-8cm but I'll take it Honestly I doubt there will be much more snowfall than that. GEM continues to be the most aggressive model but really not seeing much support for the 10-15cm it's pumping out. Using 10:1 snow ratios it would equate to 8-12cm actually, give or take. The amounts maybe slightly more closer to the lake where you reside as oppose to northern regions of the GTA. Temps don't really drop below zero all that much so I would use a slightly lower ratio, maybe 8:1. 2-3" would be my call at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Honestly I doubt there will be much more snowfall than that. GEM continues to be the most aggressive model but really not seeing much support for the 10-15cm it's pumping out. Temps don't really drop all that much so I would use a slightly lower ratio, maybe 8:1. 2-3" would be my call at this point. Yeah my inital call is around 4-8cm. For November thats good. Areas near the lake may see around 7-9cm. Yeah it would seem temperatures are near the freezing point, but we may see some mid level cooling given the cold 850mb temps nearby so 8:1 and 10:1 would be reasonable to use. We have seen sudden changes during the OBS part before, like the groundhog blizzard of 2011, so dont make conclusions just yet.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.