Chicago WX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I'd go green for the LOT CWA. 1.75" of rain not far from LAF on this run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chitown Storm Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 wisconsinwx is sweating the nam for sure Marquette beat 'Cuse. He'll be fine...I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Looks like >1.00" liquid from about rt 47 on eastward in northern IL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chargers09 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Oh yes lock it in because the NAM said so. What a joke, lets see if other new guidances align with this great sudden shift I believe all of this is sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Wouldn't surprise me lol. If the Euro holds serve I'll feel more confident on 6+ inches. ee rule is back.. been awhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 purple, easy call I wouldn't say it's an easy call, but it's certainly the best call. I think at this point, it's safe to say that 6+ amounts will be the exception, not the norm. Although yes it's possible that some in the LOT CWA break 6, the vast majority will struggle to get to 3 or 4. That said, I still think we're in for a relatively decent thump...possibly the biggest of the season...but there are just too many factors and too much uncertainty to put up a warning on this one. A heavy snow warning would've been perfect for this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Marquette beat 'Cuse. He'll be fine...I think. ILL rule is the New MU rule.. we're golden Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 A foot of snow for Saukville Nam qpf through hr54 MKE - 1.03" RAC - 1.07" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 ILL rule is the New MU rule.. we're golden 10"+, easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I believe all of this is sarcasm and tongue-in-cheek. I think some of it is serious, definitely doesn't sound sarcastic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 full moon also... what better time than ever for the NAM to pull the couple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BowMeHunter Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I think some of it is serious, definitely doesn't sound sarcastic lol its all sarcasm. and I'll stop now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Here's your next avatar TO Blizz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Natester Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361846182.821605.jpg A foot of snow for Saukville Earlier in the day, the NAM completely missed Iowa. Now it gives me 5-6 inches of cement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 I could see everything staying the same until morning. Milwaukee will need to backpedal if the GFS follows suit and the EURO stays the same. Gino is working the overnight shift so curious to see how he handles his previous thinking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 So, if we talk about what's actually going on right now, based on surface analysis the surface low looks a bit elongated from AR into MS. The lowest pressure I can find is actually in MS. 00z NAM suggests roughly due north movement until after it gets into MO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 ImageUploadedByTapatalk1361846182.821605.jpg A foot of snow for Saukville Nam qpf through hr54 MKE - 1.03" RAC - 1.07" Here in Toronto that's a tighter lake shore gradient here than I've seen on those maps. I'm guessing the NAM's gotten a little warmer. Off to check soundings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago WX Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Compare, contrast...0z NAM vs 12z NAM. Parts of MO, IA, and WI the big gainers. 12z NAM total QPF through 12z Thursday. 0z NAM total QPF through 12z Thursday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 lol its all sarcasm. and I'll stop now. Ha it's been such a long day my sarcasm detector is gone. Too much writing and work, on top of making a forecast for the entire GL basically Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted February 26, 2013 Author Share Posted February 26, 2013 LOT 842 PM...EVENING UPDATE...NO CHANGES TO THE WINTER STORM WATCH BUTMULTIPLE FORECAST CONCERNS/CHALLENGES REMAIN.IN THE IMMEDIATE SHORT TERM...WATCHING TEMPERATURE/PRECIP TRENDSACROSS CENTRAL ILLINOIS INTO NORTHWEST INDIANA. WHILE TEMPERATURESCURRENTLY REMAIN IN THE MID 30S...DEWPOINTS ARE IN THE UPPER 20STO AROUND 30. WITH NO SIGNIFICANT PUSH OF WARMER/MORE MOIST AIR ATTHE SURFACE...ITS POSSIBLE THAT TEMPS MAY DROP A FEW MORE DEGREESAND AS PRECIP BEGINS...MOST LIKELY IN THE 09Z-11Z TIME FRAME ACROSSTHE FAR SOUTHERN CWA...THAT A PERIOD OF FREEZING RAIN...PERHAPSMIXED WITH SOME SNOW/SLEET...MAY DEVELOP. CONFIDENCE REGARDINGTEMP TRENDS IS VERY LOW AND ITS POSSIBLE THAT AN ADVISORY WILL BENEED FOR THE COUNTIES SOUTH OF THE WATCH. THIS IS COMPLICATED BYPRECIP TRENDS INTO TUESDAY MORNING AND WHETHER PRECIP CHANGES OVERTO RAIN OR A MIX...THEN GOES BACK TO SNOW. AT THIS TIME...PLAN TOCONTINUE WITH THE SPS FOR THE COUNTIES SOUTH OF THE WATCH ANDMONITOR TEMP/PRECIP TRENDS INTO THE LATE EVENING TO SEE IF ANADVISORY WILL BE NEEDED.THE THERMAL PROFILES ON THE 00Z NAM ARE CONCERNING FROM THESTANDPOINT THAT THE SIGNIFICANT WARM LAYER ALOFT...+4C AT 850MBAROUND 15Z...IS VIRTUALLY GONE BY 21Z AS IT LIFTS NORTH ACROSSNORTHERN IL WITH 850MB TEMPS AT THAT TIME MOSTLY BELOW ZERO. WITHSTRONGER LIFT...AND MORE VIGOROUS UPWARD MOTION...ITS POSSIBLETHAT PRECIP MAY END UP BEING MORE SNOW AND PERHAPS ALL SNOW OVERMUCH OF THE WATCH AREA. BUT EVEN IF THIS HAPPENS...THAT DOESN/TNECESSARILY MAKE THE SNOWFALL FORECAST MUCH EASIER DEPENDING ONTHE WATER/SNOW RATIOS WHICH COULD BE AS LOW AS 6 OR 8 TO 1. AMCONCERNED THAT OUR CURRENT QPF AMOUNTS IN THE GRIDS ARE TOO LOWWITH STORM TOTALS RANGING FROM ROUGHLY 0.4 IN NORTHEAST IL TO 0.7ACROSS THE SOUTHERN CWA...BUT ALSO DON/T HAVE MUCH CONFIDENCE TOINCREASE THESE YET EITHER. IF QPF AMOUNTS END UP BEING HIGHER ANDPRECIP REMAINS MORE SNOW...AND DYNAMIC COOLING ALLOWS THE SNOWRATIOS TO FLUFF UP TO PERHAPS 10 TO 1...THEN SNOWFALL TOTALS COULDEASILY REACH 6 INCHES AND PERHAPS MORE. IN ADDITION...IT WILLBEGIN MIDDAY AND LIKELY HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON THE TUESDAYAFTERNOON RUSH HOUR. GIVEN ALL THIS...STILL PREFER TO LET THEWATCH RIDE AND LET THE MID SHIFT FULLY EVALUATE THE 00Z SUITE OFGUIDANCE. WILL ADD SNOWFALL RATES TO THE WSW HOWEVER AS IT APPEARSIF HEAVY SNOW DOES MATERIALIZE...RATES COULD EASILY REACH 1 TO 2INCHES PER HOUR. CMS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geos Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Compare, contrast...0z NAM vs 12z NAM. Parts of MO, IA, and WI the big gainers. 12z NAM total QPF through 12z Thursday. 2:25 12z NAM 60 QPF 2.gif 0z NAM total QPF through 12z Thursday. 2:26 0z NAM 60 QPF.gif Significant difference in eastern Iowa! Cyclone riding the 0.75" line now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Here's your next avatar TO Blizz. NNM.jpg . LOOL, that looks fairly juicy.haha What's your thoughts on the Nam, temperatures were again marginal and in fact looked slightly warmer than I'd want them to me, hmph. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thundersnow12 Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 LOT THE THERMAL PROFILES ON THE 00Z NAM ARE CONCERNING FROM THE STANDPOINT THAT THE SIGNIFICANT WARM LAYER ALOFT...+4C AT 850MB AROUND 15Z...IS VIRTUALLY GONE BY 21Z AS IT LIFTS NORTH ACROSS NORTHERN IL WITH 850MB TEMPS AT THAT TIME MOSTLY BELOW ZERO. WITH STRONGER LIFT...AND MORE VIGOROUS UPWARD MOTION...ITS POSSIBLE THAT PRECIP MAY END UP BEING MORE SNOW AND PERHAPS ALL SNOW OVER MUCH OF THE WATCH AREA. BUT EVEN IF THIS HAPPENS...THAT DOESN/T NECESSARILY MAKE THE SNOWFALL FORECAST MUCH EASIER DEPENDING ON THE WATER/SNOW RATIOS WHICH COULD BE AS LOW AS 6 OR 8 TO 1. AM CONCERNED THAT OUR CURRENT QPF AMOUNTS IN THE GRIDS ARE TOO LOW WITH STORM TOTALS RANGING FROM ROUGHLY 0.4 IN NORTHEAST IL TO 0.7 ACROSS THE SOUTHERN CWA...BUT ALSO DON/T HAVE MUCH CONFIDENCE TO INCREASE THESE YET EITHER. IF QPF AMOUNTS END UP BEING HIGHER AND PRECIP REMAINS MORE SNOW...AND DYNAMIC COOLING ALLOWS THE SNOW RATIOS TO FLUFF UP TO PERHAPS 10 TO 1...THEN SNOWFALL TOTALS COULD EASILY REACH 6 INCHES AND PERHAPS MORE. IN ADDITION...IT WILL BEGIN MIDDAY AND LIKELY HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON THE TUESDAY AFTERNOON RUSH HOUR. GIVEN ALL THIS...STILL PREFER TO LET THE WATCH RIDE AND LET THE MID SHIFT FULLY EVALUATE THE 00Z SUITE OF GUIDANCE. WILL ADD SNOWFALL RATES TO THE WSW HOWEVER AS IT APPEARS IF HEAVY SNOW DOES MATERIALIZE...RATES COULD EASILY REACH 1 TO 2 INCHES PER HOUR. CMS LOT gives the best discussions leading up to events, hands down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 . LOOL, that looks fairly juicy.haha What's your thoughts on the Nam, temperatures were again marginal and in fact looked slightly warmer than I'd want them to me, hmph. Those snowfall maps are really low resolution so I wouldn't read too much into it, but a slightly warmer solution would jibe with it being further north with the sfc low. Being in Vaughan though, I wouldn't worry. Probably close to if not in the sweet spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 LOT 842 PM...EVENING UPDATE...NO CHANGES TO THE WINTER STORM WATCH BUT MULTIPLE FORECAST CONCERNS/CHALLENGES REMAIN. IN THE IMMEDIATE SHORT TERM...WATCHING TEMPERATURE/PRECIP TRENDS ACROSS CENTRAL ILLINOIS INTO NORTHWEST INDIANA. WHILE TEMPERATURES CURRENTLY REMAIN IN THE MID 30S...DEWPOINTS ARE IN THE UPPER 20S TO AROUND 30. WITH NO SIGNIFICANT PUSH OF WARMER/MORE MOIST AIR AT THE SURFACE...ITS POSSIBLE THAT TEMPS MAY DROP A FEW MORE DEGREES AND AS PRECIP BEGINS...MOST LIKELY IN THE 09Z-11Z TIME FRAME ACROSS THE FAR SOUTHERN CWA...THAT A PERIOD OF FREEZING RAIN...PERHAPS MIXED WITH SOME SNOW/SLEET...MAY DEVELOP. CONFIDENCE REGARDING TEMP TRENDS IS VERY LOW AND ITS POSSIBLE THAT AN ADVISORY WILL BE NEED FOR THE COUNTIES SOUTH OF THE WATCH. THIS IS COMPLICATED BY PRECIP TRENDS INTO TUESDAY MORNING AND WHETHER PRECIP CHANGES OVER TO RAIN OR A MIX...THEN GOES BACK TO SNOW. AT THIS TIME...PLAN TO CONTINUE WITH THE SPS FOR THE COUNTIES SOUTH OF THE WATCH AND MONITOR TEMP/PRECIP TRENDS INTO THE LATE EVENING TO SEE IF AN ADVISORY WILL BE NEEDED. THE THERMAL PROFILES ON THE 00Z NAM ARE CONCERNING FROM THE STANDPOINT THAT THE SIGNIFICANT WARM LAYER ALOFT...+4C AT 850MB AROUND 15Z...IS VIRTUALLY GONE BY 21Z AS IT LIFTS NORTH ACROSS NORTHERN IL WITH 850MB TEMPS AT THAT TIME MOSTLY BELOW ZERO. WITH STRONGER LIFT...AND MORE VIGOROUS UPWARD MOTION...ITS POSSIBLE THAT PRECIP MAY END UP BEING MORE SNOW AND PERHAPS ALL SNOW OVER MUCH OF THE WATCH AREA. BUT EVEN IF THIS HAPPENS...THAT DOESN/T NECESSARILY MAKE THE SNOWFALL FORECAST MUCH EASIER DEPENDING ON THE WATER/SNOW RATIOS WHICH COULD BE AS LOW AS 6 OR 8 TO 1. AM CONCERNED THAT OUR CURRENT QPF AMOUNTS IN THE GRIDS ARE TOO LOW WITH STORM TOTALS RANGING FROM ROUGHLY 0.4 IN NORTHEAST IL TO 0.7 ACROSS THE SOUTHERN CWA...BUT ALSO DON/T HAVE MUCH CONFIDENCE TO INCREASE THESE YET EITHER. IF QPF AMOUNTS END UP BEING HIGHER AND PRECIP REMAINS MORE SNOW...AND DYNAMIC COOLING ALLOWS THE SNOW RATIOS TO FLUFF UP TO PERHAPS 10 TO 1...THEN SNOWFALL TOTALS COULD EASILY REACH 6 INCHES AND PERHAPS MORE. IN ADDITION...IT WILL BEGIN MIDDAY AND LIKELY HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS ON THE TUESDAY AFTERNOON RUSH HOUR. GIVEN ALL THIS...STILL PREFER TO LET THE WATCH RIDE AND LET THE MID SHIFT FULLY EVALUATE THE 00Z SUITE OF GUIDANCE. WILL ADD SNOWFALL RATES TO THE WSW HOWEVER AS IT APPEARS IF HEAVY SNOW DOES MATERIALIZE...RATES COULD EASILY REACH 1 TO 2 INCHES PER HOUR. CMS Nightmare of a forecast, yikes. Possibly the biggest challenge for LOT all season. One question though: this is probably because I'm not trained in meteorology, or maybe I just haven't been doing this long enough, but...it looks like the NAM thermal profiles are much too warm for the first 3 hours or so of precipitation. They mention it in the discussion, but wouldn't this significantly cut back on accumulations? I was expecting this discussion to be leaning towards an advisory, whereas the writing reads more bullish to me. What does everyone else think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brewers Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 GRB MUCH LIKE THE LAST 2 NIGHTS...THE RECENTLY ARRIVED 21Z SREF AND CURRENTLY ARRIVING 00Z NAM SHIFTED THE TRACK OF THE SRN PLAINS CYCLONE BACK TO THE NW. BUT WHAT HAPPENED YESTERDAY WAS THAT EVERYTHING THAT CAME IN AFTER THE 00Z NAM...INCLUDING THE LATER- ARRIVING 00Z RUNS AND THE 06Z RUN...TRENDED MUCH FARTHER S. LOOKING AT THE UPR LOW OVER THE SRN PLAINS RIGHT NOW...THE MAX WINDS HAVE CLEARLY ROTATED ARND TO THE ERN SIDE OF THE SYSTEM. THAT WOULD FAVOR SYSTEM TRAKING MORE NELY FROM WHERE IT IS NOW...AND BRING IT CLOSER TO THE FCST AREA. SO GUESS IS THAT AT LEAST A MODEST NWWD SHIFT WL OCCUR WITH THE REST OF THE 00Z RUNS AS WELL. SO WHILE NAM WL PROBABLY END UP BEING AN OUTLIER AGAIN...IT MAY AT LEAST BE TRENDING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION. BEST GUESS IS THAT SYSTEM WL GENERATE AN INCH OR TWO OF SNOW IN THE GRB AREA...WITH A FEW INCHES IN THE SE CORNER OF THE AREA. GIVEN THAT IDEA...CURRENT FCST APPEARS A LITTLE TOO TAME. BUT GIVEN THE GREAT STRUGGLES WE/VE HAD LOCKING IN ON THE TRACK OF THE SYSTEM AND NWD EXTENT OF THE SNOW SHIELD...DON/T PLAN ON MAKING ANY CHGS TO THE FCST THIS EVENING. THAT WL ALLOW THE MIDNIGHT SHIFT TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS AFTER REVIEWING THE ENTIRE 00Z DATASET. UPDATED PRODUCT SUITE OUT ASAP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
csnavywx Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Precip has started. Getting pingers mixed with mutilated/partially melted and refrozen snowflakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toronto blizzard Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Here's your next avatar TO Blizz NNM.jpg Done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowstorms Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 Those snowfall maps are really low resolution so I wouldn't read too much into it, but a slightly warmer solution would jibe with it being further north with the sfc low. Being in Vaughan though, I wouldn't worry. Probably close to if not in the sweet spot.. True, did you run it through BUFKIT? I think areas even around 401 including YYZ will get almost as similar amounts to area around Steeles and north, but I suspect lower totals near the Lake. Still have 24 hours, lol. I do think this storm may cause more damage than the previous one only because of the snowfall being heavier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowstormcanuck Posted February 26, 2013 Share Posted February 26, 2013 And here's your problem. ugh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.