Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Feb 24th threat part deux


Typhoon Tip

Recommended Posts

Firstly, regarding the ECM snow graphic I just saw snow does NOT match these numbers - not even close.  

 

ORH

                2 M     850     SFC     SFC     700    6 HR     500    1000

                 TMP     TMP     PRS     RHU     RHU     QPF     HGT     500

                 ©     ©    (MB)    (PCT)   (PCT)   (IN)    (DM)     THK

THU 00Z 21-FEB  -5.6   -14.1    1008      60      84    0.00     520     514   

THU 06Z 21-FEB  -8.2   -10.2    1010      74      69    0.00     527     519   

THU 12Z 21-FEB -10.1   -14.2    1012      75      82    0.00     527     519   

THU 18Z 21-FEB  -3.1   -11.6    1012      51      82    0.00     526     516   

FRI 00Z 22-FEB  -6.8    -8.5    1018      74      64    0.00     535     521   

FRI 06Z 22-FEB  -8.8    -8.0    1023      89      46    0.00     548     530   

FRI 12Z 22-FEB  -9.4    -5.3    1027      90      23    0.00     555     534   

FRI 18Z 22-FEB   1.9    -4.5    1028      65      11    0.00     557     535   

SAT 00Z 23-FEB  -3.6    -3.2    1027      89      17    0.00     557     536   

SAT 06Z 23-FEB  -5.7    -4.8    1027      91      88    0.00     556     535    

SAT 12Z 23-FEB  -4.0    -5.2    1025      91      32    0.00     555     536   

SAT 18Z 23-FEB   0.7    -3.6    1021      83      46    0.02     553     536   

SUN 00Z 24-FEB  -0.5    -1.3    1018      95      99    0.09     552     538   

SUN 06Z 24-FEB   0.0    -0.5    1011      98      99    0.30     548     539   

SUN 12Z 24-FEB   0.5    -1.4    1005      98      97    0.39     541     537   

SUN 18Z 24-FEB   0.7    -4.3    1003      94      98    0.27     535     533   

MON 00Z 25-FEB  -0.7    -7.0    1008      89      99    0.23     534     528   

MON 06Z 25-FEB  -2.0    -7.3    1011      89      80    0.04     538     529   

MON 12Z 25-FEB  -6.7    -5.1    1017      92      60    0.00     544     531 

 

A synoptic evolution such as this, with a storm running out south at perfect climo latitudes, a high parked N in a descending -NAO, and 850's that are less than 0C the entire duration... before March 1st ... I mean, how many conceptual points need to be made!   That's a classic spring blue bomb right there...  And the sfc T is undoubtely a click or two, too warm during the duration, as well.   Bank it!  

 

Now....whether that storm actually happens - that's another story.  Frankly, the models have shown some sudden intrusion of, albeit small, discontinuity/disagreement since the 00z run.  Probably still need to work on nailing down track and intensity still. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I am a little suspicious where the NAM is getting those prolific QPF numbers from... Every run since 00z has been attenuating the mid level mechanics a small amount, and the NAM seems to be heading in the other direction QPF -wise.  There may be other reasons, such as idealized frontogenic/meso action... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah ... the more I look at this - it almost seems the NAM has some runaway meso processes going on - question is, are they real?  I just saw a NAM snow graphic that put 24-36" down in a pentagunal region encompassing ORH-PVD-BOS-FIT, and NYC has almost 0 snow.  That's highly, highly unusual - but stranger things have probably happened.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It gets really warm for such a southern track. I don't know if that's ever happened.

GEM is much weaker than other guidance...a good 5-8mb weaker at 72h which is probably why it starts warmer before temps crash. You can see how as soon as the precip rates increae, it crashes the mid-level 0C line back SE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

GEM is much weaker than other guidance...a good 5-8mb weaker at 72h which is probably why it starts warmer before temps crash. You can see how as soon as the precip rates increae, it crashes the mid-level 0C line back SE.

 

Yeah it's definitely weaker..just looks odd to me, but again...shows you how dynamics need to occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

GEM is much weaker than other guidance...a good 5-8mb weaker at 72h which is probably why it starts warmer before temps crash. You can see how as soon as the precip rates increae, it crashes the mid-level 0C line back SE.

 

A good illustration of how track is important but, in a rare showing, strength looks like it will be much MORE important for many.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty confident that euro is more nam like vs GFS like.

 

I don't think so. But hey, if the Euro lined up with the NAM and showed half its QPF, I'd be pretty enthusiastic.

 

I'm still waiting for the Euro to show some real run-to-run consistency as we close in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...